Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tamilmaran vs Saran Kumar
2021 Latest Caselaw 4615 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4615 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021

Madras High Court
Tamilmaran vs Saran Kumar on 23 February, 2021
                                                                              C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED: 23.02.2021

                                                            CORAM:

                                    THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

                                                  C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020

                   Tamilmaran                                                  .. Appellant
                                                              Vs.
                   1.Saran Kumar
                   2.Branch Manager,
                     Reliance General Insurance Company Limited,
                     No.89, 100 Feet Road, Vivyan Plaza,
                     Ground Floor, Mudaliarpet,
                     Pondicherry Town,
                     Pondicherry District and State.                           .. Respondents

                   Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the
                   Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree dated
                   13.03.2020 made in M.C.O.P.No.155 of 2017 on the file of the Motor
                   Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Nagapattinam.

                                      For Appellant     :     Mr.M.Balasubramanian
                                      For R1            :     No appearance
                                      For R2            :     Mrs.C.Harini
                                                              for Mr.M.B.Raghavan

                                                       JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed for enhancement of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020

compensation granted by the award dated 13.03.2020 made in

M.C.O.P.No.155 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,

Sub Court, Nagapattinam.

2.The appellant is the claimant in M.C.O.P.No.155 of 2017 on the file

of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Nagapattinam. He filed

the above said claim petition, claiming a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- as

compensation for the injuries sustained by him in the accident that took place

on 25.02.2017.

3.The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary

evidence, held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent riding by

the rider of the motorcycle bearing Registration No.PY 02 Q 1815 belonging

to the 1st respondent and directed the 2nd respondent-Insurance Company to

pay a sum of Rs.3,34,682/- as compensation to the appellant.

4.Not being satisfied with the amounts awarded by the Tribunal, the

appellant has come out with the present appeal seeking enhancement of

compensation.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020

5.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant contended that in the

accident the appellant sustained grievous head injury, right and left leg injury,

left eye injury and entire body fracture. The Medical Board from

Nagapattinam Government Hospital examined the appellant and certified that

appellant suffered 40% disability and issued Ex.X1/disability certificate to

that effect. The Tribunal has awarded only a meagre sum of Rs.3,000/- per

percentage of disability. The appellant was running Provisional Stores and

was earning a sum of Rs.20,000/- per month at the time of accident. To prove

the same, the appellant produced Ex.P16/copy of permit license. The Tribunal

did not accept Ex.P16 and fixed only a meagre sum of Rs.7,500/- per month

as notional income of the appellant and awarded compensation towards loss

of income only for two months. The Tribunal ought not to have fixed the

notional income suo motto by arbitrary imagination and the compensation

awarded by the Tribunal towards loss of income is meagre. The amounts

awarded by the Tribunal towards pain and sufferings, transportation,

attendant charges and extra nourishment are also meagre. The Tribunal has

not awarded any amount towards loss of amenities and damages to clothes

and prayed for enhancement of compensation.

6.Though notice has been served on the 1st respondent and his name is

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020

printed in the cause list, there is no representation for him, either in person or

through counsel.

7.Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent-

Insurance Company contended that the Tribunal accepted the disability

certificate issued by the Medical Board from Nagapattinam Government

Hospital and awarded a sum of Rs.1,20,000/- for 40% disability at the rate of

Rs.3,000/- per percentage of disability and the same is not meagre. The

Tribunal rejected Ex.P16/copy of permit license on the ground that Ex.P16

was obtained from the Tamil Nadu Food Department by paying a sum of

Rs.2,000/- on 10.01.2020, i.e., one month prior to examining the appellant.

Hence, the appellant is not entitled to compensation towards loss of income

by fixing a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month as notional income as claimed by

him. The amounts awarded by the Tribunal under different heads are not

meagre. The Tribunal considering the entire materials on record, has awarded

a sum of Rs.3,34,682/- as compensation to the appellant and the same is not

meagre. The appellant has not made out any case for enhancement of

compensation and prayed for dismissal of the appeal.

8.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020

learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent-Insurance Company and

perused the entire materials on record.

9.It is the case of the appellant that in the accident he sustained

grievous head injury, right and left leg injury, left eye injury and entire body

fracture. The Medical Board from Nagapattinam Government Hospital

examined the appellant and certified that appellant suffered 40% disability

and issued Ex.X1/disability certificate to that effect. The Tribunal accepted

the disability certificate issued by the Medical Board from Nagapattinam

Government Hospital and awarded a sum of Rs.1,20,000/- for 40% disability

at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per percentage of disability. The accident is of the

year 2017 and a sum of Rs.3,000/- per percentage of disability awarded by the

Tribunal is meagre. This Court by the judgment reported in 2020 (1) TN

MAC 617 [M. Chinnathambi Vs. S.Deepa and another], fixed a sum of

Rs.4,000/- per percentage of disability for the accident occurred in the year

2014 & 2015 and a sum of Rs.5,000/- per percentage of disability for the

accident occurred from the year 2016 onwards, due to raise in cost of living.

In the present case, the accident is of the year 2017. In view of the same, a

sum of Rs.5,000/- is awarded per percentage of disability. Thus, the

compensation awarded by the Tribunal towards disability is modified to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020

Rs.2,00,000/- (Rs.5,000/- X 40% of disability).

10.It is the contention of the appellant that he was running Provisional

Stores and was earning a sum of Rs.20,000/- per month at the time of

accident. To prove the same, the appellant produced Ex.P16/copy of permit

license. The Tribunal rejected Ex.P16/copy of permit license on the ground

that Ex.P16/cash receipt was obtained from the Tamil Nadu Food Department

by paying a sum of Rs.2,000/- on 10.01.2020, i.e., one month prior to

examining the appellant. The reason given by the Tribunal for rejecting

Ex.P16 is proper but the monthly income of the appellant fixed by the

Tribunal at Rs.7,500/- is not proper. The accident occurred in the year 2017.

The cost of living has increased enormously and salary of even unskilled

workers has increased substantially. Hence, a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month is

fixed as notional income of the appellant. Due to the injuries and disability,

the appellant would not have attended his work atleast for a period of three

months. Thus, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal towards loss of

income is modified to Rs.45,000/- (Rs.15,000/- X 3 months). Considering the

nature of injuries and period of treatment taken by the appellant, the amounts

awarded by the Tribunal towards transportation, extra nourishment, pain and

sufferings and attendant charges are meagre and the same are enhanced to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020

Rs.20,000/-, Rs.25,000/-, Rs.30,000/- and Rs.20,000/- respectively. The

Tribunal has not awarded any amount towards loss of amenities and damages

to clothes. Due to the injuries and disability, the appellant would have

suffered inconvenience and would be facing discomfort in his life. Hence, the

appellant is entitled to a sum of Rs.20,000/- towards loss of amenities. The

appellant is entitled to a sum of Rs.3,000/- towards damages to clothes. The

amount awarded by the Tribunal towards medical expenses is just and

reasonable and hence, the same is hereby confirmed. Thus, the compensation

awarded by the Tribunal is modified as follows:

                    S.             Description     Amount            Amount awarded        Award
                    No                            awarded by          by this Court     confirmed or
                                                   Tribunal                (Rs)         enhanced or
                                                     (Rs)                                 granted
                    1.    Disability                  1,20,000/-           2,00,000/-     Enhanced
                    2.    Pain and sufferings           20,000/-             30,000/-     Enhanced
                    3.    Loss of income                15,000/-             45,000/-     Enhanced
                    4.    Extra nourishment             10,000/-             25,000/-     Enhanced
                    5.    Medical expenses            1,52,682/-           1,52,682/-    Confirmed
                    6.    Transportation                10,000/-             20,000/-     Enhanced
                    7.    Attendant charges                6,000/-           20,000/-     Enhanced
                    8.    Loss of amenities            -                     20,000/-      Granted
                    9.    Damages to clothes           -                      3,000/-      Granted
                          Total                  Rs.3,33,682/-        Rs.5,15,682/-     Enhanced by
                                                                                        Rs.1,81,000/-
                                                       -                                (Rs.5,15,682/-
                          Tribunal arrived at    Rs.3,34,682/                                  -
                                                                                        Rs.3,34,682/-)



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                             C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020

11.In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed and

the compensation awarded by the Tribunal at Rs.3,34,682/- is hereby

enhanced to Rs.5,15,682/- together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per

annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit. The 2 nd respondent-

Insurance Company is directed to deposit the award amount now determined

by this Court along with interest and costs, less the amount already deposited,

if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment, to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.155 of 2017 on the file of the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Nagapattinam. On such deposit, the

appellant is permitted to withdraw the award amount now determined by this

Court, along with interest and costs, less the amount if any, already

withdrawn by making necessary applications before the Tribunal. The

appellant is directed to pay the necessary Court fee as per the order of this

Court dated 16.10.2020 made in C.M.P.No.11669 of 2020 in

C.M.A.No.SR.67568 of 2020. No costs.



                                                                                     23.02.2021

                   krk

                   Index              : Yes / No
                   Internet           : Yes / No




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                       C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020




                   To

                   1.The Subordinate Judge,
                     Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                     Nagapattinam.

                   2.The Section Officer,
                     VR Section,
                     High Court,
                     Madras.





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                    C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020



                                    V.M.VELUMANI, J.
                                                krk




                                   C.M.A.No.1643 of 2020




                                              23.02.2021




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter