Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Karthik Sekar vs The Inspector Of Police
2021 Latest Caselaw 4559 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4559 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2021

Madras High Court
R.Karthik Sekar vs The Inspector Of Police on 22 February, 2021
                                                              1

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                      DATED : 22.02.2021
                                                           CORAM
                         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
                                                  Crl.O.P No.3494 of 2021
                                           and Crl.M.P Nos.2028 & 2029 of 2021
                  R.Karthik Sekar
                                                                                      .... Petitioner
                                                              vs.
                  1. The Inspector of Police,
                  Central Crime Branch-Team -II,
                  Vepery, Chennai-7.
                  Crime No.275 of 2014.

                  2. K.Sivanathan                                                ... Respondents

                  PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of
                  Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in pertaining to the proceedings in
                  CC.No.2251 of 2017 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, CCB
                  Cases, Egmore, Chennai pertaining to the case in Crime No.275 of 2014 on
                  the file of the first respondent and quash the same, in respect of the
                  petitioner/15th accused.
                                     For Petitioner      : Mr.R.Chakkaravarthy
                                     For R1              : Mr.C.Raghavan
                                                           Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

                                                          ORDER

This petition has been filed challenging the proceedings initiated by

the respondent against the petitioner in C.C.No.2251 of 2017 for the offences

under Sections 408, 420, 477A, and 34 IPC and Sections 467, 468, 471 and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

420 of IPC read with Section 120(b) IPC.

2. The grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioner are all factual in

nature and it requires appreciation of evidence and this Court cannot decide

the same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Criminal

Procedure Code. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all the grounds

before the Court below and the same shall be considered on its own merits

and in accordance with law. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the

proceedings pending before the Court below.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court to

dispense with the presence of the petitioner. Taking into consideration, the

facts and circumstances of the case, the presence of the petitioner is

dispensed with and he shall be represented by a counsel, who shall cross

examine the witnesses on the same day, they are examined in Chief. The

petitioner shall present before the Court below at the time of questioning

under Section 313 Cr.P.C and at the time of passing of the final judgment.

4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a

direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in CC No.2251 of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

2017 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this

order. The trial shall be conducted on a day to day basis in accordance with

the guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in Vinod Kumar Vs

State of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]. If the petitioner adopts any

dilatory tactics, it is open to the trial Court to insist upon the presence of

the petitioner and remand him to custody as per the judgment of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU

NATH SINGH (JT 2001 (4) SC 3191). Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petitions are also closed.



                                                                                    22.02.2021

                  Index      : Yes/No
                  Internet   : Yes/No
                  Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
                  rli
                  To

                  1. The Metropolitan Magistrate,
                  CCB Cases, Egmore, Chennai

                  2. The Inspector of Police,
                  Central Crime Branch-Team -II,
                  Vepery, Chennai-7.

                  3. The Public Prosecutor,
                  High Court of Madras,
                  Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/





                                          N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
                                                             rli




                                               Crl.O.P No.3494 of 2021
                                   and Crl.M.P Nos.2028 & 2029 of 2021




                                                           22.02.2021




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter