Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Murugan Agencies vs The Commercial Tax Officer
2021 Latest Caselaw 3986 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3986 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2021

Madras High Court
Sri Murugan Agencies vs The Commercial Tax Officer on 17 February, 2021
                                                                                 W.A.No.636 of 2021

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 17.02.2021

                                                       CORAM :

                                      The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
                                                          and
                                       The Honourable Ms.Justice R.N.MANJULA

                                                 W.A.No.636 of 2021
                                                        and
                                                C.M.P.No.2829 of 2021

                     Sri Murugan Agencies,
                     Rep. by its M.Murugaiyan (Proprietor),
                     No.6/92-A, South Street,
                     Nagapattinam - 611 111.                                         ...Appellant

                                                            Vs

                     The Commercial Tax Officer,
                     Nagapattinam Assessment Circle,
                     Commercial Taxes Buildings,
                     Court Campus, Veliyapalayam,
                     Nagapattinam.                                                   ...Respondent

                     PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside
                     the order passed in W.P.No.20869 of 2019 dated 19.07.2019.


                                          For Appellant:         Mr.K.Kulandaivelu

                                          For Respondent:        Ms.G.Dhanamadhri
                                                                 Government Advocate


                     1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                   W.A.No.636 of 2021

                                                       JUDGMENT

(Delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam,J)

This appeal, filed by the writ petitioner, is directed against the

order dated 19.07.2019 passed in W.P.No.20869 of 2019.

2. The writ petition was filed challenging a Show Cause Notice

dated 12.04.2018 issued by the respondent stating that on verification of

Form WW filed by the appellant for the year 2013-14, certain defects had

been noticed and that the appellant had not reported the purchase turnover

to the Government in their monthly return. The appellant was granted 15

days time to file their objections to the said notice dated 12.04.2018 along

with documentary evidences. The appellant submitted their objections on

16.05.2018 stating that the proposal made in the said notice dated

12.04.2018 was incorrect and referred to the decision in the case of

M/s.J.K.M. Graphics Solutions (P) Ltd. The objections were presented to

the respondent in person. As seen from the acknowledgment given by the

respondent in the office copy of the objections, which contained the

signature and seal of the respondent, the date of receipt was mentioned as

16.05.2018.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.636 of 2021

3. The appellant's grievance is that though the objections were

given by the appellant and received by the respondent on 16.05.2018, the

assessment order was passed, which is dated 11.05.2018, without taking

note of the factual position. This prompted the appellant to file the writ

petition before this Court.

4. The learned Single Bench opined that the appellant should avail

the alternate remedy of appeal provided under Section 51 of the Tamil Nadu

Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and assigned reasons and after referring to

certain decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, dismissed the writ petition.

Aggrieved by such order, the appellant is before us by way of this appeal.

5. We have elaborately heard Mr.K.Kulandaivelu, learned counsel

for the appellant and Ms.G.Dhanamadhri, learned Government Advocate

appearing for the respondent.

6. So far as the exercise of jurisdiction of this Court under Article

226 of The Constitution of India, even in cases where alternate remedy is

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.636 of 2021

provided, discretion is being exercised by this Court. This exercise of

discretion is to be done cautiously and the Courts imposed a self restraint

upon themselves while exercising their jurisdiction especially in matters

arising under a Taxation Statute. However, this is not an absolute bar and

there have been instances where Courts have exercised jurisdiction taking

note of the fact and circumstances of each case.

7. We are prompted to make the above observations on the ground

that the respondent has received the objections filed by the appellant on

16.05.2018. If, according to the respondent, he has already completed the

assessment and passed an order on 11.05.2018, the respondent could have

informed the appellant that already an order of assessment has been passed,

since the appellant did not file their objections to the notice dated

12.04.2018. However, the respondent did not inform the appellant, rather

received the objections and endorsed the receipt of the same on 16.05.2018.

Apart from that, in the assessment order dated 11.05.2018, the respondent

would admit that the appellant had received the notice dated 12.04.2018

sent by registered post on 18.04.2018. If that is so, then the appellant had

time to submit their objections till 03.05.2018. If the appellant had not

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.636 of 2021

submitted their objections within the said time limit, then the respondent

could have recorded the same in the assessment order dated 11.05.2018.

Further, the defect, which is alleged against the appellant, is on account of

verification of the other end dealers namely Annexure II through the

Departmental Website. If such is the issue, it is necessary that the appellant

should be given an effective opportunity and the Department can also

exercise their discretion to departmentally verify the correctness of the

transactions.

8. Thus, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the

case, we are inclined to grant one more opportunity to the appellant to go

before the Assessing Officer and submit fresh objections, so as to enable the

respondent to redo the assessment in accordance with law.

9. In the light of the above, the Writ Appeal is allowed and the

matter is remanded to the respondent for a fresh consideration. The

appellant is directed to treat the assessment order dated 11.05.2018 as a

notice, submit their objections within 15 days from today and on receipt of

the objections, the respondent shall endeavour to make a departmental

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.636 of 2021

verification and thereafter afford an opportunity of personal hearing to the

appellant and redo the assessment in accordance with law. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                                      (T.S.S.,J.)    (R.N.M.,J.)
                                                                             17.02.2021
                     Index: Yes/No
                     Internet:Yes/No
                     Speaking Judgment/Non speaking Judgment

                     hvk


                     To

                     The Commercial Tax Officer,
                     Nagapattinam Assessment Circle,
                     Commercial Taxes Buildings,
                     Court Campus, Veliyapalayam,
                     Nagapattinam.





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                        W.A.No.636 of 2021

                                    T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J
                                                 AND
                                        R.N.MANJULA,J

                                                      hvk




                                     W.A.No.636 of 2021
                                                     and
                                   C.M.P.No.2829 of 2021




                                              17.02.2021





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter