Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Joseph Rathinasamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2021 Latest Caselaw 3815 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3815 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2021

Madras High Court
M.Joseph Rathinasamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 16 February, 2021
                                                                          W.P.No.19436 of 2020

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 16.02.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. PUGALENDHI

                                               W.P.No.19436 of 2020


                     Germanus Springs,
                     (A Unit of MJR Hospitality and Service Apartments)
                     rep.by its Partners,
                     1. M.Joseph Rathinasamy
                     2. J. Maria Antonio
                     19/138-4, Chellapuram,
                     Kodaikanal,
                     Dindigul District.                                          ... Petitioner


                                                      ..Vs..

                     1. The State of Tamil Nadu
                        rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government
                        Housing and Urban Development Department,
                        Secretariat,
                        Chennai 600 009.

                     2. The Principal Secretary to Government,
                        Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department
                        Secretariat,
                        Chennai – 600 009.



                     1/10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                               W.P.No.19436 of 2020

                     3. The Director of Town and Country Planning
                        No.807, Anna Salai,
                        Chennai 600 002.

                     4. The District Collector,
                        Dindigul,
                        Dindigul District.

                     5. The Deputy Director of Town and Country Planning
                        No.4, HAK Street, Chinna Chokkikulam,
                        Madurai – 625 002
                        Madurai District.

                     6. The Deputy Director of Town and Country Planning
                        Dindigul,
                        Dindigul District.

                     7. The Member Secretary/Commissioner,
                        Kodaikanal Municipality,
                        Kodaikanal,
                        Dindigul District.                                         ... Respondents



                               This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

                     India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent

                     to consider the Review petition of the petitioners dated 19.03.2019 and

                     consequential representation of the petitioners dated 17.02.2020 and pass

                     suitable order on the same as per the Rule 13 of Master Plan

                     (Preparation, Publication and Sanction) Rules with regard to Kodaikanal

                     2/10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                W.P.No.19436 of 2020

                     Master Plan Map 2021 and issue errata to the Kodaikanal proposed

                     Master Plan 2021 by including the petitioners' survey Nos.T.S.31 & 35 in

                     the multi use zone.



                                        For Petitioner    :     Mr.G.Elanchezhiyan
                                        For Respondents :       Mr.D.Venkatesan
                                                                Govt.Advocate for R1 to R6
                                                                Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen
                                                                Standing Counsel for R7



                                                           ORDER

This writ petition is filed for a mandamus directing the first

respondent to consider the review petition of the petitioner dated

19.03.2019 and consequential representation dated 17.02.2020 and for

passing necessary order as per the Rule 13 of Master Plan (Preparation,

Publication and Sanction) Rules with regard to Kodaikanal Master Plan

Map 2021 and for issuing necessary errata in this regard.

2. The petitioner is a company represented by its partners viz.,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.19436 of 2020

M.Joseph Rathinasamy and J.Maria Antonio. The case of the petitioners

is that they had constructed a building in Ward No.A, Block No.4, Town

Survey No.31 of the Kodaikanal Municipality and running the same as a

Hotel and Restaurant in the name and style of Germanus Springs. The

Commissioner Kodaikanal Municipality has also granted building

permission for the said building. However, the zone in which the building

is constructed is classified as a primary residential zone as per the Master

Plan 1993 and in the year 2016 a draft modified master plan was

published by the seventh respondent, in which this petitioners land was

classified as primary residential zone instead of multi use zone without

verifying the ground of reality and development in the area. The

petitioners and others have made a request to the first respondent for

conversion of land and the respondent Municipality has also passed a

Resolution No.66 dated 05.01.2018 and submitted the Resolution for

land conversion to the Deputy Director of Town and Country Planning

(i/c), Madurai. The Deputy Director of Town and Country Planning has

also forwarded the same to the Government and the same is still pending

under consideration of the first respondent along with the said

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.19436 of 2020

Resolution. The Kodaikanal Municipality has also enclosed a list of

Panchayatars who have consented for Master plan and the petitioners

property in Ward A, Block 4 T.S.No.31 is also included by specifying the

land use with a proposal for conversion that this T.S.No.31 may be

changed from primary residential zone to multi use zone.

3. Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Standing Counsel for the

seventh respondent Kodaikanal Municipality opposed the maintainability

of the writ petition itself by referring the order passed by the Madurai

Bench of Madras High Court in WP(MD).No.914 of 2018. The

Kodaikanal Municipality has taken action as against the buildings

constructed deviating the approved plan and the petitioners and similar

other 94 persons have filed a batch of writ petitions before the Madurai

Bench of Madras High Court challenging the order of the Kodaikanal

Municipality and the same were taken up together in W.P.(MD).No.914

of 2018 and this Court directed the municipality to lock and seal all the

premises. Accordingly all the premises are under the lock and seal

including the petitioners premises. According to Mr.Mohamed Mohideen,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.19436 of 2020

learned Standing Counsel, the said writ petition is still pending before the

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court and the Court is issuing

continuous mandamus on this issue and therefore the petitioners ought to

have filed this writ petition only before the Madurai Bench of Madras

High Court and therefore he has objected for entertaining this writ

petition.

4. Mr.G.Elanchezhiyan, learned counsel for the petitioner, by relying

on the Resolution passed by the Kodaikanal Municipality, made his

submission that the issue involved in this writ petition is for necessary

orders on the application filed by the petitioners on land conversion

which has also been accepted by the Municipality and a Resolution has

also been passed by the Municipality recommending for conversion of the

land. This Resolution has been specifically forwarded to the Deputy

Director of Town and Country Planning and to the Government and it is

under consideration by the Government and therefore the land conversion

is within the domain of the Government and the Secretary is within the

jurisdiction of this Court and therefore this writ petition is rightly filed

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.19436 of 2020

before this Court.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner also relied upon several

judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court that when a part of the cause of

action arises from the jurisdiction of this Court, this Court can entertain

the writ petition.

6. This Court paid its anxious consideration to the rival submissions

made and perused the materials produced before this Court.

7. The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to the

first respondent to consider the review petition of the petitioners dated

19.03.2019 and consequential representation dated 17.02.2020.

8. The review petition appears to be pending from the year 2019.

Without expressing anything on the merits of the review petition pending

before this Court, this Court disposes of the writ petition with a direction

to the first respondent to dispose of the review petition pending on the file

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.19436 of 2020

of the first respondent within a period of eight weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order. While considering the same, the first

respondent shall also consider the order passed by the Madurai Bench of

Madras High Court in W.P.No.914 of 2018 and batch. No costs.




                                                                                 16.02.2021

                     Internet   : Yes
                     Index      : Yes/No
                     Speaking/Non speaking order
                     dpq






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                       W.P.No.19436 of 2020




                     To

1. The Principal Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

3. The Director of Town and Country Planning No.807, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

4. The District Collector, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

5. The Deputy Director of Town and Country Planning No.4, HAK Street, Chinna Chokkikulam, Madurai – 625 002 Madurai District.

6. The Deputy Director of Town and Country Planning Dindigul, Dindigul District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.19436 of 2020

B. PUGALENDHI, J.

dpq

7. The Member Secretary/Commissioner, Kodaikanal Municipality, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

W.P.No.19436 of 2020

16.02.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter