Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3135 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2021
W.A.(MD)No.292 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 09.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
W.A.(MD)No.292 of 2021
Robinson,
Secretary, Matha Educational Society,
Karode Post,
Arumana,
Kanyakumari District. : Appellant
Vs.
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner,
Sub Regional Office,
E.P.F. Organization,
66, Water Tank Road,
Nagercoil – 1,
Kanyakumari. : Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the
order dated 08.04.2019 made in W.P.(MD)No.9249 of 2011.
For Appellant : Mr.K.Sreekumaran Nair
For Respondent : Mr.K.Gurunathan
*****
1/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.A.(MD)No.292 of 2021
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)
The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant / petitioner after
having failed in it's challenge to the order passed under Section 7(A) of the
Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
2. The learned Single Judge perused the entire records and recorded a
factual finding that even the report filed by the appellant itself shows 25
employees were engaged. There was an admission with respect to the said fact.
Incidentally, on remand, the appellant has been heard at length and sufficient
opportunity has been given.
3. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that there are
records to show that there are only 14 employees.
4. We cannot go into the said issue, in view of the unimpeachable evidence
available on record and that too, when it is maintained by the appellant itself. This
aspect has been taken note of by the learned Single Judge. Though the writ
http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.(MD)No.292 of 2021
petition, as such, ought not to have been entertained, as there is an alternative
remedy available under Section 7(I) of the Act, inasmuch as the learned Single
Judge has considered the matter on merits, which we do not find it illegal or
incorrect, the present appeal is liable to be dismissed.
5. We also note that the matter has been kept pending for nearly two decades
and the employees have already approached the respondent / Commissioner for
settlement. In any case, they are also not parties before us, as ultimately their
interest is being affected due to the prolonged proceedings without any basis.
6. In the result, this writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs.
Index : Yes / No [M.M.S.,J.] [S.A.I.,J.]
Internet : Yes 09.02.2021
gk
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.A.(MD)No.292 of 2021
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
AND
S.ANANTHI, J.
gk
W.A.(MD)No.292 of 2021
09.02.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!