Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Principal Commissioner Of ... vs M/S.Khazana Jewellery Private ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 2222 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2222 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2021

Madras High Court
The Principal Commissioner Of ... vs M/S.Khazana Jewellery Private ... on 2 February, 2021
                                                                        TCA.Nos.100, 104 & 109 of 2021


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 02.02.2021

                                                       CORAM :

                                      The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
                                                          and
                                        The Honourable Ms.Justice R.N.MANJULA

                                       Tax Case Appeal Nos.100, 104 & 109 of 2021
                                                          and
                                            C.M.P.Nos.1783 & 1790 of 2021

                     The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
                     TDS Circle I,
                     Chennai.                             ...Appellant in all cases

                                                          Vs

                     M/s.Khazana Jewellery Private Limited,
                     No.252-A, T.T.K.Road,
                     Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018.
                     PAN: AAACK2564Q                       ...Respondent in all cases

COMMON PRAYER: Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 13.10.2017 made in ITA.No.1831/Mds/2014 for the assessment year 2011-12, ITA.No.1829/Mds/2014 for the assessment year 2009-10 and ITA.No.1830/Mds/2014 for the assessment year 2010-11 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.Nos.100, 104 & 109 of 2021

(in all cases) For Appellant: Mr.Karthik Ranganathan Senior Standing Counsel

For Respondent: Mr.A.S.Sriraman

COMMON JUDGMENT (Delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam,J)

These appeals, filed by the Revenue, are directed against the order

dated 13.10.2017 made in ITA.No.1831/Mds/2014 for the assessment year

2011-12, ITA.No.1829/Mds/2014 for the assessment year 2009-10 and

ITA.No.1830/Mds/2014 for the assessment year 2010-11 on the file of the

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench ('The Tribunal' for

brevity).

2. The appellant-Revenue in all these appeals has raised the

following substantial questions of law for consideration:

"1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that the financial benefit provided to customers on the gold promotional scheme shouldn't be treated as "interest" u/s 2(28A) and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.Nos.100, 104 & 109 of 2021

isn't liable to TDS u/s 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that the banking charges paid by the assessee company to banks for facilitating credit and debit card payments are not liable to TDS u/s 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the AY's 2009-10 to 2013-14?

3. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that the services provided by the bank in this regard are not any managerial, technical or consulting services to the assessee?"

3. We have heard Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, learned Senior

Standing Counsel for the appellant-Revenue and Mr.A.S.Sriraman, learned

counsel for the respondent.

4. The learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the

appellant submits that the above appeals are not pursued by the Revenue on

account of the low tax effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.Nos.100, 104 & 109 of 2021

08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said

Circular, the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High

Court has been increased to Rs.1 Crore. It is further submitted that the tax

effect in this case is less than the threshold limit.

5. In the light of the said submissions, the above tax case appeals

are dismissed on account of the low tax effect. The substantial question of

law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold

limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to file a

petition before this Court to restore the appeals to be heard and decided on

merits. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are

closed.

                                                                             (T.S.S.,J.)    (R.N.M.,J.)
                                                                                    02.02.2021
                     Index: Yes/No
                     Internet:Yes/No

Speaking Judgment/Non speaking Judgment

hvk

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.Nos.100, 104 & 109 of 2021

To

1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench.

2. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle I, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.Nos.100, 104 & 109 of 2021

T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J AND R.N.MANJULA,J

hvk

T.C.A.Nos.100, 104 & 109 of 2021 and C.M.P.Nos.1783 & 1790 of 2021

02.02.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter