Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2159 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021
W.A(MD)No.812 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL
W.A(MD)No.812 of 2012
and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012
The Registrar,
Bharathidasan University,
Trichy – 24. ... Appellant/2nd Respondent
Vs.
1.Vasanthi ... 1st Respondent / Petitioner
2.The Director of Collegiate Education,
Chennai. ... 2nd Respondent / 1st Respondent
3.The Principal,
A.D.M College for Women (A),
Nagapattinam – 611 001.
4.Selvi ... Respondents 3 & 4/
Respondents 3 & 4
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set
aside the order, dated 22.08.2012 made in W.P(MD)No.4242 of 2012
on the file of this Court.
http://www.judis.nic.in
1/4
W.A(MD)No.812 of 2012
For Appellant : Mr.VR.Shanmuganthan
For R – 1 : Mr.V.K.Vijayaragavan
For R – 2 : Mr.M.Murugan,
Government Advocate.
For R – 3 : Mr.D.Selva Kumar
For R – 4 : Mr.P.Natarajan
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.)
This Writ Appeal is directed against the order, dated 22.08.2012
passed in W.P(MD)No.4242 of 2012.
2.The writ petitioner, who is the first respondent in the Writ
Appeal, who was rusticated from her M.Phil guideship for two years
was challenged in the Writ Petition, which was allowed originally.
3.The appellant / second respondent-University has preferred
the above Writ Appeal.
4.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant / second
respondent-University submitted that the first respondent / writ
petitioner is no more and therefore, nothing survives for further
adjudication in this Writ Appeal.
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.A(MD)No.812 of 2012
5.In view of the above, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as
infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition
is closed.
[P.S.N.,J] [S.K.,J.]
01.02.2021
Index :Yes/No
Internet :Yes/No
ps
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To
1.The Director of Collegiate Education, Chennai.
2.The Registrar, Bharathidasan University, Trichy – 24.2
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.A(MD)No.812 of 2012
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.
and
S.KANNAMMAL,J.
ps
W.A(MD)No.812 of 2012
01.02.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!