Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2125 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021
C.M.A.No.2372 of 2019 and
C.M.P.No.10815 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.02.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
C.M.A.No.2372 of 2019 and
C.M.P.No.10815 of 2019
M/s.United India Insurance
Company Limited,
No.134, Greams Road,
Chennai 600 006.
... Appellant
Vs.
Thiru.J.Premkumar (deceased)
1.Thirumathi J.Shanthi
2.Thiru.Saravanan
.. Respondents
Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of the
Employees Compensation Act, 1923, against the final award dated
21.08.2018 (received on 23.02.2019), passed by the learned
Commissioner for Employees Compensation (Joint Commissioner of
Labour – I) at Chennai, in E.C.No.164 of 2011.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Michael Visuvasam
For Respondents : Mr.F.Terry Chellaraja for R1
R2-notice sent-insufficient address
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.M.A.No.2372 of 2019 and
C.M.P.No.10815 of 2019
JUDGMENT
The award dated 21.08.2018 passed in E.C.No.164 of 2011,
is under challenge in the present civil miscellaneous appeal.
2. The substantial question of law raised in the present civil
miscellaneous appeal on hand is that in the absence of any finding
regarding the employee employer relationship, the liability shall be
saddled on the Insurance Company. Admittedly, there is no finding in
the award regarding the employee employer relationship between the
employee and the employer.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour has to be adjudicated the
issues based on the facts and circumstances and arrive a conclusion
whether the employee employer relationship existed between the parties
at the time of accident. This being the factual aspects to be decided, this
Court is not inclined to entertain this appeal. Further, the matter is
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2372 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.10815 of 2019
remanded back for re-adjudication of this issue for the purpose of fixing
the liability on the Insurance Company.
4. Accordingly, the award dated 21.08.2018 passed in E.C.No.164
of 2011, is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Joint
Commissioner of Labour I, Chennai – 6, for re-adjudication of the issue
with reference to the employee employer relationship and the accident
occurred during the course of the employment and accordingly, pass an
award on merits and in accordance with law by affording an opportunity
to all the parties concerned. The said exercise is directed to be done
within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order. Thus, C.M.A.No.2372 of 2019 stands allowed. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
5. The parties to the suit are directed to cooperate for the earlier
disposal of the suit. The Trial Court should decline unnecessary
adjournments on flimsy grounds if sought for by the parties to the suit.
The adjournments sought are to be granted only on genuine grounds and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2372 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.10815 of 2019
by recording reasons. Thus, the Trial Court is expected to proceed with
the case without granting any unnecessary adjournments either at the
instance of the parties or by the Courts.
01.02.2021 Index: Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-Speaking Order gsk
To The Joint Commissioner of Labour – I, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2372 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.10815 of 2019
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
gsk
C.M.A.No.2372 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.10815 of 2019
01.02.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!