Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 24536 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2021
T.C.A.No.1024 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.12.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.No.1024 of 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax Central I,
Chennai. ... Appellant
Versus
M/s.Sri Ramachandra Educational and
Health Trust,
25 Sir C.V.Raman Road,
Alwarpet, Chennai 600 018.
... Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “C” Bench,
dated 03.12.2008 in I.TA.No.398/Mds/2008.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanaswamy
For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivaraman
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
T.C.A.No.1024 of 2009
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
This tax case appeal has been filed by the appellant / Revenue,
challenging the order dated 03.12.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench, in I.T.A.No.398/Mds/2008, relating to the
assessment year 2004-05.
2.By order dated 27.10.2009, this court admitted the aforesaid tax case
appeal on the following substantial question of law:
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellate Tribunal is right in holding that the assessee trust was prevented by circumstances beyond its control from withdrawing the deposit of Rs.50 lakhs from Egmore Benefit Fund Society Ltd., and investing the same in the modes prescribed under Section 11(5) of the Income Tax Act before the commencement of the relevant previous year and in deleting the addition of Rs.50 lakhs made by the assessing officer on that ground?"
3.When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.1024 of 2009
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeal shall not be filed/pursued by the Department
before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4.In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said to
be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping
open the substantial question of law for determination in an appropriate case.
No costs.
(R.M.D., J.) (M.S.Q., J.) 13.12.2021 av
Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.1024 of 2009
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
av
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench,
2. Commissioner of Income Tax Central I, Chennai.
T.C.A.No.1024 of 2009
13.12.2021 (1/2)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!