Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 24063 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2021
Tax Case Appeal No.1413 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.12.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tax Case Appeal No.1413 of 2009
M/s. Rajkumar Exports Pvt. Ltd.,
(now merged with Raj Kumar Impex Pvt Ltd),
B 603, Keshav Durga Apartments,
No.1, East Avenue,
Keshav Perumal Puram, R.A.Puram,
Chennai 600 028. ... Appellant
Vs.
The Income Tax Officer (OSD),
Company Circle V(3),
Chennai 600 034 ... Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “D”
Bench, Chennai dated 31.03.2009 passed in I.T.A.No.767/Mds/2008.
For Appellant : Mr.Padmanabhan
For Respondent : Mr.T.Ravikumar
Senior Standing Counsel
Page 1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Tax Case Appeal No.1413 of 2009
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the appellant / Assessee
challenging the order dated 31.03.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Bench 'D', Chennai ('the Tribunal', for brevity) in
I.T.A.No.767/Mds/2008 for the Assessment Year 2003-2004.
2.The above appeal was admitted on 09.02.2010 on the following
substantial questions of law :
“1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in upholding the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Act?
2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in law in upholding that the interest on Margin Money deposits for opening Letter of Credit and DEPB proceeds are not eligible for deduction u/s.801A of the Act?”
3.When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
appearing for the appellant / assessee submitted that during the pendency of
Page 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tax Case Appeal No.1413 of 2009
this tax case appeal, the assessee has availed the benefit conferred under the
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and filed necessary declarations,
which were accepted and Form 5 / order for full and final settlement of tax
arrears, was also issued by the Income tax department, on 06.05.2021. The
learned counsel has also filed Form 5 dated 06.05.2021 to that effect.
4.The aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the
appellant/assessee has also been fairly conceded by the learned senior
standing counsel appearing for the respondent/ Revenue.
5.In view of the subsequent development, this court is of the opinion
that nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal. Recording the
submission so made by the learned counsel on either side, the Tax Case
Appeal stands disposed of. No costs.
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q, J.]
07.12.2021
msr
Internet : Yes
Index : Yes / No
Page 3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tax Case Appeal No.1413 of 2009
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
msr
To
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “D” Bench
2.The Income Tax Officer (OSD), Company Circle V(3), Chennai 600 034
Tax Case Appeal No.1413 of 2009
07.12.2021 (2/2)
Page 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!