Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Unknown vs Asiatic Engineers Private ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 17790 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17790 Mad
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2021

Madras High Court
Unknown vs Asiatic Engineers Private ... on 31 August, 2021
                                                                           C.S.No.494 of 1999

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED : 31.08.2021

                                                    CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

                                                C.S.No.494 of 1999


                     1. L.G.Varadarajulu
                     (Deceased on 19.05.2010)

                     2. Dark Horse Portfolio Investment Limited
                     (Amended as per order dated 02.08.2021 in
                     Appl. No. 2608 of 2021 in C.S.No.494 of 1999)

                     3. M/s.ELGI Ultra Industries Ltd.,
                                                                            ...Plaintiffs

                                                          Vs.

                     Asiatic Engineers Private Limited,
                     13/11, East Patel Nagar,
                     New Delhi.
                     (Amended as per order dated 12.01.2000 in
                     Appl. No. 4086 of 1999 in C.S.No.494 of 1999)
                                                                            ...Defendant

                     PRAYER: Plaint FILED under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules read with
                     Order VII Rule I of the Civil Procedure Code; and Sections 53 and 54 of
                     the Designs Act, 1911 and Sections 55 and 58 of The Copyright Act
                     praying for :

                     Page No.1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  C.S.No.494 of 1999



                               a) A decree of perpetual injunction, restraining the defendants,
                     their men, servants, agents assigns and each and any other person
                     claiming under them, from, in any way manufacturing or selling or
                     offering for sale or marketing or advertising or otherwise dealing with
                     their product Maharaja Whiteline Supra Table Top Wet Grinders or any
                     variation thereof which uses and/ or utilises the claims and
                     representations of the plaintiffs' design bearing No.163445 and 163446
                     and/ or any part or portion thereof and/ or which comes within the range
                     scope and/ or purview of the said design or any part thereof;


                               b) A decree of perpetual injunction, restraining the defendants,
                     their servants, agents assigns and each one of them, from passing off and
                     selling their table top wet grinders with their existing design which is a
                     flagrant copy of the plaintiff's registered design;


                               c) Delivery up upon oath of all dies, casts, apparatus etc., relating
                     to manufacture of table top wet grinders by the defendants, their servants,
                     agent and assigns and each one of them that in any manner have
                     infringed Registered Design Nos.163445 & 163446 dated 25 th July 1991
                     and verification upon oath that the defendants do not have in their
                     possession, power, control or custody any such infringing dies, c asts or
                     apparatus.




                     Page No.2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                    C.S.No.494 of 1999

                               d) A decree of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants,
                     their servants, agents and assigns and each of them from in any way,
                     infringing the plaintiff's copy right in its instruction manual or any part or
                     portion thereof in any manner whatsoever


                               e) Decree for damages for Rs.1,00,000/- as claimed hereinabove as
                     loss and damages suffered by the plaintiffs together with interest at 24%
                     per annum from the date of plaint to the date of realisation;


                               f) directing the defendants and each of them, their servants, agents
                     and assigns to render true and faithful accounts in respect of the
                     infringing goods sold by the said defendants which infringed Design and
                     direct an enquiry into the loss and damage suffered by the plaintiffs by
                     reason of the aforesaid wrongful acts and infringement and pass a decree
                     for the amount due and payable upon such enquiry and


                               g) directing the defendants to pay the costs of the suit.



                                     For Plaintiffs      : Mr.Harshavardhanan Ganesan
                                                           for Mr.R.Parthasarathy

                                     For Defendant       : Mr.Ram Kumar
                                                           Mrs.Nrindha Mohan

                                                         ********



                     Page No.3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                             C.S.No.494 of 1999

                                                  JUDGMENT

Mr.Harshavardanan Ganesan, learned counsel representing the

counsel for the plaintiff would submit that they have instructions to

withdraw the suit.

2. Recording the same, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No

costs.



                                                                                   31.08.2021
                     dsa/ep
                     Index      : No
                     Internet   : Yes
                     Non-Speaking order

List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff : Nil List of the witnesses examined on the side of the defendant: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the defendant: Nil

31.08.2021 dsa/ep

Page No.4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.494 of 1999

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dsa/ep

C.S.No.494 of 1999

31.08.2021

Page No.5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter