Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T.Kannika Parameswari vs The Secretary To Government
2021 Latest Caselaw 17637 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17637 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 August, 2021

Madras High Court
T.Kannika Parameswari vs The Secretary To Government on 27 August, 2021
                                                                        W.A. No.1964 of 2021

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 27.08.2021

                                                     CORAM

                     THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                      and
                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


                                               W.A.No.1964 of 2021


                T.Kannika Parameswari
                ...Appellant

                                                       Vs.

                1.The Secretary to Government
                  Home Department
                  Secretariat, Fort St. George
                  Chennai - 600 009

                2.The Additional Director General of Police
                  & Inspector General of Prison
                  Chennai - 600 008                                      ...Respondents
                                                      ****
                Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                against the order dated 17.02.2020 in W.P.No.3310 of 2015.


                                                      ****


                                   For Appellants       : Mr.V.Kannan

                                   For Respondent       : Mr.C.Jayaprakash
                                                          Govt. Advocate




                    ____________
http://www.judis.nic.in
                Page No.1 of 8
                                                                     W.A. No.1964 of 2021



                                               JUDGMENT

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

The unsuccessful petitioner before the writ court, is the

appellant herein, questioning the order of the writ court dated

17.02.2020 in W.P.No.3310 of 2015, by which the writ court declined

to grant terminal benefits to the appellant herein/writ petitioner

including pension from the date of her retirement on par with other

Female Escort Warders by taking into account 50% of the services

rendered by her as female escort warder from 20.09.1985 to

22.06.2006.

2. The appellant herein/petitioner was originally appointed as

Female Escort Warder temporarily on daily wage basis on 20.09.1995

and thereafter, the 2nd respondent, by letter dated 06.01.1998,

informed the petitioner that her request for regularization along with

others, was pending consideration with the 1st respondent. The

petitioner along with others filed Original Application No.672 of 2004

before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal. After abolition of the

said Tribunal, the Original Application No.672 of 2004 has been

transferred to this Court and re-numbered as W.P. No. 18354 of

2007. This Court, by order dated 19.08.2009 disposed of the said

____________ http://www.judis.nic.in

W.A. No.1964 of 2021

writ petition by directing the 1st respondent to consider the case of

the petitioner.

3. The petitioner's request was rejected and once again she

filed another writ petition in W.P. No. 25668 of 2009 and the same

was disposed of on 12.04.2010 directing the respondent to consider

the case of the petitioner, in the light of G.O. Ms. No.2617 dated

17.12.1988 in a time bound manner. Though the Government in

G.O. Ms.2617 Home (Prisons-II) Department dated 17.12.1988 has

passed appropriate orders, relaxing the Age and Educational

Qualifications, but rejected the request of the petitioner by way of

another order in G.O. Ms.No. 710 Home (Prisons-II) Department

dated 17.08.2005.

4. Aggrieved by the said government order in G.O. Ms. No.

710, dated 17.08.2005, the petitioner has filed another writ petition

in W.P. No.19355 of 2010, and this Court, by order dated 31.10.2011

has issued directions to the 1st respondent to pass appropriate

orders relaxing the Age and Educational Qualification and regularise

her prospectively. The said order was confirmed in W.A. No.2240 of

2012 dated 18.10.2012. In view of the said order of this Court, the

petitioner was appointed on regular basis by the 2nd respondent vide

____________ http://www.judis.nic.in

W.A. No.1964 of 2021

order dated 24.10.2013 and thereafter the petitioner retired from

service on 30.05.2014. After her retirement, the petitioner has made

representations to the respondents on 08.08.2014 and 12.09.2014 to

consider her service from the date of initial appointment for the

purpose of terminal benefits including pension on par with regular

employee in the light of the judgment of this Court. As there was no

response, the petitioner has knocked at the doors of this court by

way of a writ petition. The learned single Judge, dismissed the writ

petition by order dated 12.05.2017 and the same is questioned in

this intra-court appeal.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on

record.

6. A perusal of records, reveals that the petitioner was

originally appointed as Female Escort Warder temporarily on daily

wage basis and she was terminated from service in the year 2006.

Again, as per the directions issued by this Court, she was

reappointed on regular basis vide order dated 24.10.2013 issued by

the 2nd respondent and she retired from service on 30.05.2004.

Now the relief sought for by the petitioner is to grant terminal

benefits including pension by regularising her service from the date

____________ http://www.judis.nic.in

W.A. No.1964 of 2021

of initial appointment as daily wages.

7. Subsequent to the directions issued by this court in W.P.

No.19355 of 2010 dated 31.10.2011, G.O. Ms. No. 790, Home

(Prison-2) Department, dated 04.10.2013, has been passed, to

regularise petitioner's service prospectively by relaxing certain

qualification, age and education of the petitioner. As per the said

G.O, the petitioner was issued appointment order, appointing her on

regular basis, prospectively. The petitioner, having failed to

challenge the order regularizing her prospectively, now cannot seek a

direction to the respondents herein to grant terminal benefits

including pension from the date of her retirement on par with other

Female Escort Warders by taking into account 50% of her erstwhile

service.

8. Moreover, in a reference before the Hon'ble Full Bench of

this court in Government of Tamil Nadu represented by

Secretary to Government, Public Works Department,

Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009 and others vs R.Kaliyamoorthy,

reported in 2019-2-L.W.-673, the Hon'ble Full Bench, has held as

follows:

45. In the light of the above, we answer the reference as follows:

i) Those who are freshly appointed on or after

____________ http://www.judis.nic.in

W.A. No.1964 of 2021

01.04.2003 are not entitled to pension in view of proviso to Rule 2 of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 inserted by G.O.Ms.No.259 dated 06.08.2003;

(ii) Those government servants/employees appointed prior to 01.04.2003 whether on temporary or permanent basis in terms of Rule 10 (a) (i) of Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules will be entitled to get pension as per the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

(iii) In case, a government employee/servant had also rendered service in non-provincialised service, or on consolidated pay or on honorarium or daily wage basis and if such services were regularised before 01.04.2003, half of such service rendered shall be counted for the purpose of conferment of pensionary benefits.

(iv) Those government servants who were appointed in the aforesaid four categories before the cut off date and later appointed under Rule 10 (a) (i) of Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules before 01.04.2003 and absorbed into regular service after 01.04.2003 will not be entitled to count half of their past service for the purpose of determination of qualifying service for pension.

(v) Those government servants who were appointed in the aforesaid four categories before 01.04.2003 but were absorbed in regular service after 01.04.2003 will not be entitled to count half of their past service for the purpose of determination of

____________ http://www.judis.nic.in

W.A. No.1964 of 2021

qualifying service for pension;

9. Hence, following the dictum laid down in the decision of the

Full Bench, the learned single Judge held that writ petitioner's service

cannot be counted for the purpose of determining the qualifying

service for pension and hence declined the relief sought for by the

petitioner and dismissed the writ petition by order dated 17.02.2020.

In view of the settled position, we do not find any defect in the order

of the learned single Judge and the same is sustained.

10. In the result, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. However, there

is no order as to costs.

                                                              [P.S.N., J.]    [K.R., J.]
                                                                     27.08.2021
                Index              : Yes/No
                Internet           : Yes/No

                Asr

                To

                1.The Secretary to Government
                  Home Department
                  Secretariat, Fort St. George
                  Chennai - 600 009

2.The Additional Director General of Police & Inspector General of Prison Chennai - 600 008

____________ http://www.judis.nic.in

W.A. No.1964 of 2021

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

Asr

W.A.No.1964 of 2021

27.08.2021

____________ http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter