Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16168 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2021
Crl.O.P.No.6496 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Crl.O.P.No.6496 of 2018
and
Crl. M.P. No. 3388 of 2018
V.Rajakumaran ... Petitioner
Vs.
State Represented by
Inspector of Police
S-15, Selaiyur Police Station
Chennai.
(Crime No. 1230/2017) ... Respondents
Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for
the records culminated in first information report in Cr. No.1230 of 2017 dated
22.07.2017 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Rajakumaran
For Respondents : Mr.C.E.Pratap
Government Advocate (Crl. side)
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the F.I.R in
Crime No.1230 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is working as Deputy https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Crl.O.P.No.6496 of 2018
Manager of Kaleesuwari Refinry Ltd., Mambakkam Main Road, Vengaivasal,
Chennai. There are 750 employees are working in the factory. Out of which, there
is 250 women employees are working and the factory is functioning round the
clock. In the meanwhile. two TASMAC liquor shops attached with deluxe bar
have been opened near the factory premises. From the day of opening of the abve
Tasmac shops, there is continuous threatening to security and safety of women
employees.
3. On 22.07.2017, Vengaivasal Villagers, its President and the petitioner's
factory employees organized a demonstration in front of the Tasmac shops, for
which the respondent police registered a case against the petitioner and other
accused persons in Cr.No.1230 of 2017 for the offence under Section 143 & 188
of IPC.
4. Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed the present petition to
quash the FIR.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on 22.07.2017, the
petitioner and Vengaivasal Villagers, its President and the petitioner's factory
employees organized a demonstration in front of the Tasmac shops in peaceful https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ manner without affecting law and order. The petitioner is arrayed as first accused
Crl.O.P.No.6496 of 2018
in the FIR. But there is no specific overtact attributed against the petitioner and
there is no allegation for threatening to cause damage to the public property. The
mere fact that the petitioner was a part of group which stood in front of the
Tasmac shop and raising slogans seeking closure of Tasmac shops. Hence, the
learned counsel prays to quash the FIR.
6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned
Government Advocate (Crl side).
7.The facts of the present case is covered by the reported Judgments of this
Court in Jeevanandham and others Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police and
another reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 606 and Sri Raja Vs. State Rep. By
Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District, and
another reported in (2019) 2 LW Crl 350. Accordingly, the FIR in Crime
No.393 of 2020, is hereby quashed and the Criminal Original Petition is allowed.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
09.08.2021
Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No rli https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Crl.O.P.No.6496 of 2018
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
rli
To
1. The Inspector of Police S-15, Selaiyur Police Station Chennai.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of the Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.6496 of 2018 and Crl. M.P. No. 3388 of 2018
09.08.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!