Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Glosoft Technologies Private ... vs M/S.Squadra Education Private ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 16133 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16133 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2021

Madras High Court
Glosoft Technologies Private ... vs M/S.Squadra Education Private ... on 9 August, 2021
                                                                          C.S.No.225 of 2012

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED : 09.08.2021

                                                    CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

                                             C.S.No.225 of 2012
                                                    and
                                          O.A.Nos.265 & 266 of 2012
                                                    and
                                          A.Nos.2202 & 2203 of 2012

                     GLOSOFT TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
                     Represented by its Chairman and Managing Director,
                     Mr.Mehroof I.Manalody,
                     “Pearlmount”, Office No.-15,
                     3rd Floor, Dharma Towers,
                     88/150, Nelson Manickam Road,
                     Choolaimedu, Chennai – 600 094.
                                                                             ...Plaintiff
                                                      .Vs.
                     1.M/s.Squadra Education Private Limited
                       represented by its Director Mr.Vijaykumaran T.,
                       33/272-F, Anugraha, Malaparamba,
                       Kozhikode – 673 009, Kerala.

                     2.M.Shabeeh Ussanali Veetil

                     3.Ashraf Kokkur

                     4.Madathil Poothampalli Savan Kumar

                     5.Peruvalath Ajaykumar                                 ... Defendants


                     Page No.1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                C.S.No.225 of 2012

                               Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read
                     with Sections 134 & 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 praying for a
                     judgment and decree:
                               (a) Granting Permanent Injunction restraining the defendants by
                     themselves, their servants, agents, partners, franchisees, men or
                     representatives or anyone claiming though them from in any manner
                     infringing      the   plaintiff's   Trade   Mark    'G-TEC    COMPUTER
                     EDUCATION' and 'G-TEC' by using the similar or deceptively similar
                     Trade Mark fro the compute education services offered by the defendants
                     together with any write up or any other representation or words which are
                     in any manner identical to and deceptively similar with the Trade Mark
                     of the plaintiff in respect of the defendants' services by use of the
                     defendants' boards, hoardings, stationary, course materials, brochures,
                     pamphlets, advertisements or in any manner exhibiting to the public;
                               (b) Granting Permanent Injunction restraining the defendants by
                     themselves, their servants, agents, partners, franchisees, men or
                     representatives or anyone claiming though them from in any manner
                     passing off the defendants' educational services 'GiTEC' or 'Gi TEC
                     Education' bearing the offending trade mark with identical and / or
                     deceptively similar mark, colour scheme, get up and write up or the
                     defendants' web address, www.giteceducation.com, as and for the
                     celebrated computer education service of the plaintiff bearing the trade
                     mark 'G-TEC COMPUTER EDUCATION' and 'G-TEC' and the
                     plaintiff's website 'gteceducation.com', with peculiar get up and write up


                     Page No.2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                   C.S.No.225 of 2012

                     either by misrepresentation to the public or offering the services or in any
                     manner advertising the defendants' offending services 'GiTEC' or 'Gi
                     TEC Education', or such other deceptively similar mark to the public;
                               (c) Directing the defendants to surrender to the plaintiffs the entire
                     stock of unused offending 'GiTEC' or 'Gi TEC Education' materials,
                     course study materials, together with blocks and dyes, name boards,
                     hoardings, stationary, brochures, advertisement materials and pamphlets,
                     and compact discs hard discs carrying the infringing 'GiTEC' or 'Gi TEC
                     Education' mark for destruction;
                               (d) Directing the defendants to render a true and faithful account of
                     the profits earned by it through the sale of the offending educational
                     service or such other trade or calling bearing the offending trade mark
                     'GiTEC' or 'Gi TEC Education' and directing payment of such profits to
                     the plaintiffs for the infringement and passing off committed by the
                     defendants;
                               (e) Directing the defendant to pay to the plaintiffs the cost of the
                     suit.


                                     For Plaintiff       : Mr.Perumbulavil Radhakrishnan
                                                           - No instructions

                                     For Defendants      : Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam

                                                         ********




                     Page No.3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                             C.S.No.225 of 2012

                                                 JUDGMENT

Mr.Perumbulavil Radhakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for

the plaintiff would submit that the plaintiff has taken back the papers

even during the year 2013-14 along with the consent for change of

vakalat. No new counsel has entered appearance.

2. Hence, the suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Consequently, the connected applications are closed.



                                                                                   09.08.2021

                     dsa
                     Index          : No
                     Internet       : Yes
                     Non-Speaking order

List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff : Nil List of the witnesses examined on the side of the defendants: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the defendants: Nil

09.08.2021 dsa

Page No.4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.225 of 2012

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dsa

C.S.No.225 of 2012

09.08.2021

Page No.5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter