Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sugumar vs The Divisional Manager
2021 Latest Caselaw 9929 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9929 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 April, 2021

Madras High Court
Sugumar vs The Divisional Manager on 19 April, 2021
                                                                              C.M.A.No.1915 of 2013

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 19.04.2021

                                                           CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                                 C.M.A.No.1915 of 2013

                     Sugumar                                                   ... Appellant

                                                           Versus

                     The Divisional Manager,
                     Bajaj Alliance General
                       Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                     No.25/26, Prince Towers,
                     Nungambakkam,
                     Chennai.                                                  ... Respondent

                     Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
                     Motor Vehicles Act, against the order and decree dated 09.01.2012 made in
                     M.A.C.T.O.P.No.232 of 2007, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims
                     Tribunal and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai.


                                           For Appellant     : Mr.R.Terry Chellaraja
                                           For Respondent    : Ms.R.Sree Vidhya




                     Page 1 of 8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                               C.M.A.No.1915 of 2013

                                                      JUDGMENT

This appeal is laid as against the judgment and decree dated

09.01.2012 made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.232 of 2007, on the file of the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Tiruvannamalai,

thereby awarded the compensation to the tune of Rs.45,000/-.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to

hereunder according to their litigative status before the Tribunal.

3. The case of the claimant is that on 11.03.2007, the claimant had

driven the car and due to loss of control, he dashed against the culvert and

met with an accident. In that accident, the claimant sustained injuries over

forehead and fracture in his right hand. Since the claimant covered with

personal accident policy, he filed claim petition seeking compensation of

Rs.5,00,000/-.

4. Resisting the same, the respondent filed counter stating that

claimant is the driver cum owner of the vehicle and only due to the rash and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1915 of 2013

negligent driving, he met with an accident. Admittedly, the claimant had

driven the car and no other vehicle was involved in the said accident. The

claimant only drove the car in rash and negligent manner and dashed against

the culvert and caused accident. Therefore, the respondent is not at all liable

to pay any compensation as claimed by the claimant and sought for

dismissal of the claim petition.

5. On the side of the claimant, he examined P.W.1 & P.W.2 and

marked Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.10. On the side of the respondent, they examined

R.W.1 and marked Ex.R.1. On the basis of the evidence available on records

and also considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing

on either side, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.45,000/- as compensation

payable by the respondent. Being not satisfied with the quantum of the

compensation awarded by the Tribunal, the claimant came forward with the

present appeal.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant/claimant

submitted that the accident took place in the year 2007 and the claimant

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1915 of 2013

sustained injuries on his forehead and fracture in the right hand. He was

admitted in the Government Hospital, Thiruvannamalai and thereafter he

took treatment at Sri Ramachandra Medical College Hospital, Chennai. His

disability was assessed at 25%. Even then, the Tribunal awarded a sum of

Rs.15,000/- for his permanent disability. Insofar as other heads are

concerned very meager amount was awarded as compensation. Therefore,

he prayed for enhancement of the award amount.

7. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent

contended that the claimant had driven the car in rash and negligent manner

and dashed against the culvert and caused accident. The claimant is a tort-

feasor and he himself had driven the car in rash and negligent manner and

cased the accident without involving any other vehicle. In fact, the

respondent also filed appeal in C.M.A.No.2364 of 2012 before this Court, in

respect of the liability is concerned, since the claimant is the driver of the

car and on whose negligence the accident was took place. The claimant is

being the tort-feasor, he is not entitled for any compensation and sought for

dismissal of the claim petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1915 of 2013

8. Heard Mr.F.Terry Chellaraja, learned counsel appearing for the

appellant/claimant and Ms.R.Sree Vidhya, learned counsel appearing for the

respondent.

9. On 11.03.2007, the claimant had driven the car and due to loss

of control, he dashed against the culvert and met with an accident. Due to

the rash and negligent driving of the claimant, the car was capsized and the

claimant and others were sustained grievous injury. The claimant was aged

about 40 years and he sustained fracture on his right hand. He was admitted

in the Government Hospital, Thiruvannamalai and thereafter she shifted to

Sri Ramachandra Medical College Hospital, Chennai, as inpatient. His

disability is a partial disability and therefore, the Tribunal rightly awarded a

sum of Rs.15,000/- towards permanent disability.

10. In other heads also the Tribunal rightly awarded compensation

and this Court does not find any illegality or infirmity in the award passed

by the Tribunal. Though the respondent contended that the claimant being

the tort-feasor, he is not entitled for any claim, the claimant was covered

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1915 of 2013

with Personal Accident Policy. Therefore the Tribunal rightly awarded a

sum of Rs.45,000/- as compensation for the injuries sustained by him.

Therefore, nothing warrant to interfere with the judgment and decree passed

by the Tribunal by this Court.

11. In fine, the award dated 09.01.2012 passed by the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai in

M.A.C.T.O.P.No.232 of 2007, on the file of the is hereby confirmed and the

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to

costs.

19.04.2021 (2/2) Index:Yes/No Internet: Yes/no Speaking/Non-speaking Order

rts

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1915 of 2013

To

1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1915 of 2013

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

rts

C.M.A.No.1915 of 2013

19.04.2021 (2/2)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter