Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9851 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2021
W.A.No.56 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.04.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
W.A.No.56 of 2020
D.Nilavazhagan ..Appellant
Vs
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Madhavaram Taluk, Ambattur,
Thiruvallur District, Chennai.
2.The Tahsildar,
Madhavaram Circle,
Puzhal, Thiruvallur District,
Chennai – 66.
3.The Special Tahsildar,
(Settlement Officer),
Puzhal, Thiruvallur District,
Chennai – 66.
4.D.Illayarajan
..Respondents
Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against
the order dated 06.11.2019 in W.P.No.29416 of 2019.
For Appellant : Mr.P.Sidharthan
For Respondents : Mr.V.Kadhirvelu,
Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3
Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar for R4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Page 1 of 4
W.A.No.56 of 2020
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)
This appeal has been preferred by the appellant, aggrieved
against the order of the learned Single Judge, who was pleased to
dismiss the writ petition filed, challenging the order of the first
respondent, on the ground that the same has been filed after a
period of four years and he did not participate in the enquiry.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted
that before the enquiry by the first respondent, the appellant has
not been put on notice. Even before the notice could be served, the
proceedings were concluded. The order impugned was obtained by
him belatedly as it was not served on him.
3. The aforesaid averments being factual, we are not
willing to go into the same. Even otherwise, it is for the official
respondents to substantiate the procedural compliance.
4. Considering the above, we are inclined to permit the
appellant to file revision before the District Revenue Officer,
Thiruvallur within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of
a copy of this judgment raising all the contentions. After the revision
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.56 of 2020
is filed within the aforesaid time, the said authority is expected to
dispose it of on merits and in accordance with law after affording
opportunity to the appellant and the fourth respondent. Appropriate
orders are to be passed within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
5. The writ appeal stands disposed of accordingly. No
costs. Consequently, the connected C.M.P.No.718 of 2020.
(M.M.S., J.) (R.N.M., J.)
17.04.2021
Internet : Yes/No
ssm/mmi
To:
1.The District Revenue Officer, Thiruvallur.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madhavaram Taluk, Ambattur, Thiruvallur District, Chennai.
3.The Tahsildar, Madhavaram Circle, Puzhal, Thiruvallur District, Chennai – 66.
4.The Special Tahsildar, (Settlement Officer), Puzhal, Thiruvallur District, Chennai – 66.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.56 of 2020
M.M.SUNDRESH,J.
and R.N.MANJULA,J.
(ssm)
W.A.No.56 of 2020
17.04.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!