Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9726 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2021
W.P.(MD)No.14818 of 2014
S.Panchacharam v. President
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH Court
DATED: 16.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
W.P.(MD)No.14818 of 2014
and M.P.No.1 of 2014
(Through Video Conferencing)
S.Panchacharam ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.President,
Virathanur Panchayt,
Virathanur, Madurai.
2.Block Development Officer&
Thirupparankundram Panchayat Union,
Thirunagar, Madurai
3.Commissioner
Thirupparankundram Panchayat Union,
Thirunagar, Madurai – 625 006.
4.District Collector
Madurai District, Madurai.
5.M.Nagaselvi ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.P.(MD)No.14818 of 2014
S.Panchacharam v. President
India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3
and their officials to take immediate and necessary action on the complaint
dated 10.05.2010.
For Petitioner :Mr.R.A.Manoharan
For Respondents :Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah for R2
Additional Government Pleader
Mr.P.Mahendran for R4
Additional Government Pleader
Mr.D.Senthil for R5
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus
directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take action on the complaint given by the
petitioner on 10.05.2010.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 5th respondent has
managed to get a water connection to her property through the property
belonged to the petitioner. The petitioner, therefore, made a representation
to the respondents 1 to 3 to take action and to withdraw the permission
given in favour of the fifth respondent.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD)No.14818 of 2014 S.Panchacharam v. President
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Additional Government Pleaders appearing on behalf of the respondents.
4. It was brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner already
filed a suit in O.S.No.104/2010 against the 5th respondent and the same was
dismissed and thereafter it was also confirmed in appeal in A.S.No.61/2018.
This judgment has also become final.
5. In view of the above development, no useful purpose will be served
in directing the respondents to take action on the complaint given by the
petitioner, since the petitioner has failed to establish his right before the
competent civil Court. In view of the same, there are no merits in this writ
petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
16.04.2021
Internet : Yes
RR
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD)No.14818 of 2014 S.Panchacharam v. President
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To
1.Block Development Officer& Thirupparankundram Panchayat Union, Thirunagar, Madurai
2.Commissioner Thirupparankundram Panchayat Union, Thirunagar, Madurai – 625 006.
3.District Collector Madurai District, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD)No.14818 of 2014 S.Panchacharam v. President
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
RR
W.P.(MD)No.14818 of 2014
16.04.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!