Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11238 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2021
C.R.P.(NPD).No.3464 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.04.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
C.R.P.(NPD).No.3464 of 2016
and C.M.P.No.17662 of 2016
Anbalagan ... Claimant/ Petitioner/
Petitioner /Petitioner
Vs.
1.Jothi ... Plaintiff/decree holder/
st
1 respondent /Respondent
2.Manivel
3.Selvaraj ... defendants/judgement debtor
Respondents 2 and 3/Respondents
PRAYER: The Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil
Procedure Code, against the judgment and decreetal order of the Subordinate
judge, Attur in E.A.95 of 2016 in E.P.26 of 2008 in O.S.3 of 2007 dated
9.9.2016.
For Petitioner : M/S.Abirami for
M/S.V.Raghavachari.
For Respondents : M/S.Zeenath Begam for R1
: No Appearance for RR2 and R3
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
1/4
C.R.P.(NPD).No.3464 of 2016
ORDER
(Heard through video conferencing)
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the judgment and
decreetal order of the Subordinate judge, Attur in E.A.95 of 2016 in E.P.26 of
2008 in O.S.3 of 2007 dated 9.9.2016.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Executing Court has
dismissed the petition filed under Section 47 of CPC under a wrong provision.
However, it is seen that an order has already been passed on 15.11.2016 that the
petitioner cannot invoke the Section 47, CPC and the Executing Court ought to
have dismissed the application on that ground. However, the Executing Court has
dismissed the application for some other reason. So observations has been made
that the petitioner is at liberty to file an application under Order 21 of Rule 97 of
CPC before the Executing Court itself. However notice was ordered to be sent to
the respondents just for the purpose of keeping the respondents also on notice
about the development.
3. After notice, R1 appeared through counsel. Notice served to R2 and R3
through Court, but no one had entered appearance for R2 and R3. Since the
process of issuing notice to the respondents has been completed, this Civil https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.R.P.(NPD).No.3464 of 2016
Revision Petition is closed, by giving liberty to the petitioner to file a petition
under Order 21 of Rule 97 of CPC before the Executing Court itself and agitate
his contentions there. No cost. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous
Petition in C.M.P.No.17662 of 2016, is also closed.
30.04.2021 Speaking/Non-speaking Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No
Jrs
To
1.The Subordinate judge, Attur.
2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.R.P.(NPD).No.3464 of 2016
R.N.MANJULA,J.
jrs
C.R.P.(NPD).No.3464 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.17662 of 2016
30.04.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!