Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vikram Choubey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1302 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1302 MP
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2026

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Vikram Choubey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 9 February, 2026

Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
Bench: G. S. Ahluwalia
         NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:11255




                                                             1                           MCRC-6454-2026
                             IN     THE        HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                     AT JABALPUR
                                                         BEFORE
                                          HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA
                                                ON THE 9 th OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                            MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 6454 of 2026
                                                     VIKRAM CHOUBEY
                                                           Versus
                                               THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                          Appearance:
                                  Shri Ashish Tiwari - Advocate for the applicant.

                                  Smt.Swati A.George - Deputy G.A. for the respondent/State.

                                                                 ORDER

Case diary is available.

2 . This first application under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/439 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for grant of bail.

3 . The applicant has been arrested on 4.8.2025 in connection with Crime No.568/2025 registered at Police Station Madhavnagar, District Katni, for offence under Sections 296, 115(2), 109(1), 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS.

4. It is submitted by counsel for the applicant that bail application of

co-accused has been decided by a coordinate Bench of this court.

5. Since the Hon'ble Judge who has decided the applications of co- accused has demitted his office therefore, this application has been listed before this court.

6 . It is submitted by counsel for applicant that the name of the applicant was neither mentioned in the FIR nor he has been named by any of

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:11255

2 MCRC-6454-2026 the witnesses. Even in the first memorandum of co-accused persons, the applicant was not named; but, in the second memorandum of Deepak and Mohit, it was alleged that applicant had also caught hold the deceased. The applicant is in jail for the last more than seven months. The trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no possibility of his absconding or tampering with prosecution witnesses. It is further submitted that bail application of co-accused Ishwar Rajani has been allowed and the case of the present applicant is identical to the case of Ishwar Rajani.

7. Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by counsel for the State. It is submitted that as per the FSL report, blood of blood group of the deceased was found on the clothes of the applicant. However, it is fairly conceded that neither the name of the applicant is mentioned in the FIR nor

any of the witnesses have named him and he has been taken into custody only on the basis of confessional statements made by co-accused persons.

8. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 9 . Admittedly, the confessional statements made by accused are not admissible. However, whether the solitary circumstance of presence of blood of the deceased on the clothes of the applicant would be sufficient to record his conviction or not, is not to be decided by this Court at this stage; but, one thing is clear that except one circumstance, i.e., presence of blood of the deceased on the clothes of the applicant, there is no other evidence.

10. Accordingly, considering the period of detention as well as the nature of allegations coupled with the fact that co-accused Ishwar Rajani has already been granted bail by order dated 25.11.2025 passed in

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:11255

3 MCRC-6454-2026 M.Cr.C.No.52814/2025 whose case is identical to that of the present applicant, the application for grant of bail is hereby allowed. It is directed that applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.

11. This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective and the trial Court shall be free to take the applicant in custody.

12. In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of XYZ and Others Vs. State of M.P. and Another, reported in (2021) 16 SCC 179, the intimation regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.

13. Certified copy as per rules.

(G. S. AHLUWALIA) JUDGE

HS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter