Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Basant Kumar Choubey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 3118 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3118 MP
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Basant Kumar Choubey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 January, 2025

Author: Dwarka Dhish Bansal
Bench: Dwarka Dhish Bansal
         NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:2890




                                                                 1                            WP-1039-2025
                               IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                     AT JABALPUR
                                                         BEFORE
                                       HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL
                                                   ON THE 21st OF JANUARY, 2025
                                                   WRIT PETITION No. 1039 of 2025
                                         BASANT KUMAR CHOUBEY AND OTHERS
                                                        Versus
                                       THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                            Appearance:
                               Shri Rahul Kumar Tripathi, Advocate for petitioners.
                               Ms. Supriya Singh, Dy. Govt. Advocate for respondents/State.

                                                                     ORDER

This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners seeking the following reliefs :-

"(I) It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus by directing the respondents to decide and consider the case of petitioners which is fully covered by the judgment passed by this Hon'ble Court in WA No. 1821/2018.

(II) It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and decide fresh representation of petitioners in light of judgment delivered in the case of Manmohan Mathur and Smita Shrivastava Vs. State of M. P. & others.

(III) It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus direct the respondents

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:2890

2 WP-1039-2025 to issue the appointment order after considering the case of petitioners in view of unamended criteria for appointment on the post of Contract Teacher Grade-lll, if found otherwise eligible for appointment with all the consequential benefits.

(IV) Any other relief/order/direction/prod which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner along with cost of entire litigation."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners' case is squarely covered by decisions given by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Harishankar Sharma and others Vs. The State

of Madhya Pradesh and others in W.P. No.23569/2022, decided on 05.09.2024 (at Jabalpur) and Mahendra Sahu and others Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others in W.P. No. 27571/2024 decided on 25.09.2024 (at Jabalpur). He further submits that petitioners may be permitted to submit fresh representation(s) in respect of their grievance with further direction to respondent 2 to decide the same in the light of decisions in the case of Harishankar Sharma and others (supra) and Mahendra Sahu and others (supra) by passing a reasoned and speaking order in a time bound manner.

3. The prayer made on behalf of the petitioners has not been opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State.

4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the innocuous prayer made on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioners is hereby accepted with

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:2890

3 WP-1039-2025 a direction to the petitioners to submit fresh representation(s) to the respondent 2-Commissioner Rajya Shiksha Kendra, Pusak Bhawan, B-Wing, Area Hills Bhopal within a period of 15 days and in turn, respondent 2 is directed to decide the representation(s) of the petitioners within a further period of 90 days from the date of receipt of representation along with the certified copy of the order passed by this Court today by passing a reasoned and speaking order.

5. If the case of petitioners is found to be covered by the decisions in the case of Harishankar Sharma and others (supra) and Mahendra Sahu and others (supra), the petitioners shall be given the requisite benefits in accordance with law.

6. It is also directed that the respondent 2 shall intimate the decision on representation to the petitioners.

7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits and demerits of the case.

8. With the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed off.

9. Misc. application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed.

(DWARKA DHISH BANSAL) JUDGE

KPS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter