Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hav. Manoj Kumar Mishra vs Union Of India
2024 Latest Caselaw 16535 MP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16535 MP
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2024

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Hav. Manoj Kumar Mishra vs Union Of India on 6 June, 2024

                                                           1                            WP-15275-2024
                            IN    THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                AT JABALPUR
                                                      BEFORE
                                           HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN
                                                 ON THE 6 th OF JUNE, 2024
                                             WRIT PETITION No. 15275 of 2024

                           BETWEEN:-
                           HAV. MANOJ KUMAR MISHRA S/O SHRI ASHOK
                           KUMAR    MISHRA,   AGED   ABOUT    40  YEARS,
                           OCCUPATION: SERVICE VILLAGE NAGAI POST DHERA,
                           DISTRICT MAUGANJ (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                      .....PETITIONER
                           (BY SHRI SHEETAL TIWARI - ADVOCATE)

                           AND
                           1.    UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY
                                 MINISTRY OF DEFENCE GOVERMENT OF INDIA
                                 NEW DELHI GOVERNMENTO OF INDIA NEW
                                 DELHI, (DELHI)

                           2.    DIRECTOR   GENERAL, NATIONAL SECURITY
                                 GUAR D MEHRAM NAGAR, PALAM NEW DELHI
                                 (DELHI)

                           3.    OFFICER IN CHARGE, NEW DELHI HQ NSG(PERS
                                 BR), MEHRAM NAGAR PALAM NEW DELHI
                                 (DELHI)

                           4.    THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, GUR GAON BOMB
                                 DISPOSAL UNIT, NSG, MANESAR, GURGAON,
                                 HARYANA (HARYANA)

                           5.    THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, N A S H I K ARTY
                                 RECORDS, C/O 56 APO NASHIK (MAHARASHTRA)

                                                                                   .....RESPONDENTS
                           (NONE )

                                 This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
                           following:
Signature Not Verified
                                                            ORDER

Signed by: KUNDAN SHARMA Signing time: 07-06-2024 15:16:57 2 WP-15275-2024 The present petition has been filed challenging the order (Annexure-P/2) whereby penalty of fine equal to 7 days pay has been awarded to the petitioner along with reprimand by National Security Guards (N.S.G.). Further challenge is made to the order (Annexure - P/8) whereby NSG had repatriated the petitioner prematurely to his parent force i.e. Indian Army.

The petitioner is holding the substantive post of Hawaldar in Indian Army and he was sent on deputation to N.S.G. Stationed at Manesar (Haryana) from May, 2022 to May, 2025. By the order (Annexure-P/8) N.S.G. has repatriated the petitioner to the Indian Army. The order (Annexure - P/2) has been passed by N.S.G., which is the Stationed at Manesar (Haryana). The petitioner was

also posted at Manesar (Haryana) during the service tenure with the N.S.G. By the order (Annexure - P/8) the petitioner has been repatriated to the parent force i.e. Indian Army from N.S.G. headquarter Manesar (Haryana).

On a query of this Court, it is fairly admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was sent to N.S.G. on deputation from his present unit i.e. 217 MED Regiment and the said regiment is not having any regimental Centre in the territory of State of Madhya Pradesh. Thus, upon repatriation, the petitioner would join at any place but not in any station within the territory of State of Madhya Pradesh. To maintain the petition before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Nawal Kishore Sharma Vs. Union of India and others reported in 2014 (9) SCC 329.

Upon perusal of the said judgment, it is seen that the case was relating to the disability compensation of an employee discharged from service of Shipping Corporation of India and after discharge from service, he had shifted

to his home town in the State of Bihar. Thus, the correspondence with the

3 WP-15275-2024

employee was being made at his native address situated in the State of Bihar.

In the present case, the petitioner is still in service and it is a case of repatriation. The petitioner was neither sent on deputation from any place in Madhya Pradesh nor he served on deputation in Madhya Pradesh. Upon repatriation also, he would not serve within the territory of State of Madhya Pradesh. The grievance is with NSG whose Headquarter at Manesar (Haryana). In view of the aforesaid set of facts, no cause of action arises within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court only on the account of the facts that native place of the petitioner is in District Mauganj, Madhya Pradesh.

The Petition is dismissed for want of territorial jurisdiction.

(VIVEK JAIN) V. JUDGE K.S.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter