Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3203 MP
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA
ON THE 2 nd OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 15610 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
RAJNEESH KUMAR UPADHYAY S/O SHRI GIRDHAR
PRASAD UPADHYAY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: SERVICE R/O POLICE LINES QUARTER
NO. 1109 GYA BLOCK THANA CIVIL LINES, JABALPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY MS. NEELU DUBEY - ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND
1. HOME SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT
VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2. JILA ADHYAKSH COLLECTOR, JABALPUR
KARYALAYA JILA JABALPUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3. POLICE ADHIKSHAK JABALPUR JILA JABALPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4. NAGAR POLICE ADHIKSHAK ADHARTAL
SAMBHAG JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. THANA PRABHARI THANA ADHARTAL JABALPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI H.K. GOLHANI - PANEL LAWYER)
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-
"7.1 यह िक करण म उ कंिडका कं.6-7 म विणत मह वपूण सारभूत सा य को पेश फरारी अिभयोग प अ तगत धारा 299 द. .सं. अिभयोग प ं .631/17 िदनांक 25.10.2017 म स म लत कराए जाने हेत ु।
7.2 यह िक करण म फरार आरोपी के िगर तारी हेत ु समुिचत यास एवं धारा 82,83, द. .सं. के तहत समुिचत कायवाही िकए जाने हेत ु। 7.3 यह िक करण म आरोिपय ारा कराए गए फज / कूटरिचत शपथ प के साथ ज त नामांत रण करण म संबं धत के ह त लिप नमूना लए जाकर परी ण कराने तथा आयी सा य के अ य सहआरोिपय के िव कायवाही कर िव पूरक अिभयोग प उ संबं धत यायालय पेश करने हेत ु ।
7.4 यह िक करण के शी िनराकरण हेत ु अ य कोई अनुत ोष आदेश जो माननीय उ च यायालय उिचत समझे।"
Virtually by the relief petitioner is having an alternative and efficacious remedy for filing a complaint under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. if the authorities are not taking any action on the complaint made by the petitioner and there are specific provisions under Cr.P.C. for approaching the concerning Magistrate
under Section 156 (3) of the Cr.P.C..
The law is settled with respect to the aforesaid issue, the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Sudhir Bhaskar Rao Tambe Vs. Hemant Yashwant Dhage and others reported in (2016) 6 SCC 277 and Sakri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. reported in (2008) 2 SCC 409 wherein the aforesaid analogy was considered concurrently and was held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the remedy of approaching the concerning court for filing of private complaint is available to the petitioner.
No such relief has been claimed by the petitioner can be granted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner may avail the remedy as available in law.
The writ petition sans merit and is accordingly dismissed.
(VISHAL MISHRA) JUDGE SSL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!