Ramkumar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2024 Latest Caselaw 21005 MP

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Ramkumar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 August, 2024

Author: Sunita Yadav

Bench: Sunita Yadav

                                                            1                             CRA-8228-2024
                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                   AT GWALIOR
                                                      CRA No. 8228 of 2024
                                             (RAMKUMAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH )



                         Dated : 02-08-2024
                               Mr. Prasum Kumar Maheshwri - Advocate for the appellant.

                               Mr. K.K. Prajapati - Public Prosecutor for the respondent / State.

Heard on I.A.No.14578 of 2024, first application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellant with an alternative prayer for grant of temporary bail as record has not been

received.

The appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence dated 15.7.2024 passed by Sessions Judge, District Ashoknagar (M.P.) in Sessions Trial No. 03/2023, whereby, appellant has been convicted and sentenced under Section 325/34 of IPC to undergo maximum imprisonment of two years with maximum fine of Rs.5000/- with default stipulations.

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that learned trial Court has wrongly convicted the appellant without appreciating the evidence properly

available on record. Further submission is that there are material omissions and contradictions in the statement of the prosecution witnesses. Appellant was on bail during trial and did not misuse the liberty so granted. Therefore, prayer is made for grant of temporary suspension of sentence and grant of bail for a limited period.

On the other hand, learned State counsel opposed the application and

2 CRA-8228-2024 prayed for its rejection.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the materials available on record.

Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, without commenting on merits of the case, it is directed that subject to depositing of fine amount, if not already deposited, and on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, the remaining jail sentence of the appellant shall remain temporarily suspended for a period of three months from today and he be released on bail.

List the case on 04.9.2024.

Meanwhile, Registry is directed to call the record of the Court below. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned Court below for compliance.

Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.

(SUNITA YADAV) JUDGE

AKS