Vishweshar vs Jitendra
2023 Latest Caselaw 16041 MP

                                                          1
                           IN    THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                               AT JABALPUR
                                                   BEFORE
                                  HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL
                                           ON THE 27 th OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
                                           REVIEW PETITION No. 734 of 2022

                          BETWEEN:-
                          VISHWESHAR S/O SHRI NETLAL, AGED ABOUT 68
                          YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST R/O VILLAGE
                          MOHGAON BAIJU TEHSIL KHAIRLANJI DISTRICT
                          BALAGHAT (M.P.) (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                     .....PETITIONER
                          (BY SHRI UMESH SHRIVASTAVA - ADVOCATE )

                          AND
                          1.    JITENDRA S/O POORANLAL, AGED ABOUT 38
                                YEARS, R/O VILLAGE MOHGAON BAIJU TEHSIL
                                KHAIRLANJI    DISTRICT BALAGHAT   (M.P.)
                                (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          2.    MST. AMRITA BAI W/O DEVI PRASAD, AGED
                                ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE ARAMBHA AND
                                TAHSIL KHAIRLANJI DISTRICT BALAGHAT
                                (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          3.    MST. NUTESHWARI BAI W/O TIKAMCHAND,
                                AGED   ABOUT     36  YEARS, R/O VILLAGE
                                DONGARIYA TAHSIL KHAIRLANJI DISTRICT
                                BALAGHAT M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          4.    STATE    OF   MADHYA  PRADESH THROUGH
                                COLLECTOR BALAGHAT DISTRICT BALAGHAT
                                M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                  .....RESPONDENTS
                          (BY SHRI SANJAY SHARMA - ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENTS 1-3,
                          MS. GARIMA TIWARI - PANEL LAWYER)

                                This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
                          following:
                                                           ORDER

Signature Not Verified Signed by: ANUPRIYA SHARMA Signing time: 9/29/2023 11:06:38 AM

This review petition has been preferred by the petitioner challenging the judgment/order dated 19.05.2022 passed in S.A.No.281/2020.

2. After arguments at length, learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant/defendant has not been able to point out any illegality or error in the judgment/order dated 19.05.2022.

3. Resultantly, there being no error apparent on the face of the record, this review petition fails and is hereby dismissed.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand dismissed.

(DWARKA DHISH BANSAL) JUDGE anu

Signature Not Verified Signed by: ANUPRIYA SHARMA Signing time: 9/29/2023 11:06:38 AM