Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15335 MP
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
ON THE 19 th OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
MISC. APPEAL No. 1902 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORTATION
BHOPAL THJROUGH IT MR. AWADESH DUBEY AGE 59
PSOTED AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER (CIVIL) MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION BHOPAL O/O NEAR MATA MANDIR T.T.
NAGAR BHOPAL, DISTT. BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPELLANT
(BY SHRI TABREZ SHEIKH - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. JITENDRA KUSHWAHA S/O TARUN KUSHWAHA,
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O GRAM BIJLOAN
TEHSIL AND DISTRICT SEHORE PRESENTLY R/O
BEHIOND CHOLA MANDIR TEHSIL HUZUR
DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. AMLOK SINGH S/O SHRI RAMESH SINGH R/O
NEAR MANIT COLLEGE HARSHWARDHAN
NAGAR, DISTT. BHOPAL DISTRICT BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. THROUGH
MANAGER (I.C.) O/O T P HUB 11-B INDRAPURI,
BHEL RAISEN ROAD, BHOPAL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(NONE)
T h is appeal coming on for orders this day, t h e cou rt passed the
following:
ORDER
Heard on I.A. No.5758/2023, an application for condonation of delay of
Signature Not Verified 85 days in filing the appeal.
Signed by: TULSA SINGH Signing time: 9/22/2023 5:57:31 PM
For the reasons mentioned in the application, aforesaid IA is allowed and the delay is condoned.
This appeal is filed by the Municipal Corporation, Bhopal being aggrieved of award dated 27/09/2022 passed by 15th Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhopal in Claim Case No.2197/2016.
2. This Court has perused the impugned award. Grievance of the appellant is that order of pay and recover is inappropriate, therefore, that order may be modified.
3. On perusal of the award, it appears and it discussed by learned Claims Tribunal that driver of the offending vehicle was not having a valid driving
license to drive the offending vehicle at the time of accident, therefore, award has been passed directing the insurance company to pay the compensation and then recover it from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle.
4. This judgment being in consonance with the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pappu and others Vs. Vinod Kumar Lamba & another, (2018) 3 SCC 208 and there being no material on record to dispute the fact that driver was having a valid driving license, yet it has not been considered by learned Claims Tribunal, there is no substance in the appeal calling for interference. Even the appellant has failed to produce copy of any driving license of the driver of the offending vehicle Amlok Singh, S/o Ramesh Singh on record to point out that at the time of accident, he was in possession of valid driving license. Thus, having failed to produce a driving license to prove the factum of availability of driving license with driver, impugned award cannot be faulted with.
5. Accordingly, this miscellaneous appeal fails and is hereby dismissed. Signature Not Verified Signed by: TULSA SINGH Signing time: 9/22/2023 5:57:31 PM
(VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE ts
Signature Not Verified Signed by: TULSA SINGH Signing time: 9/22/2023 5:57:31 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!