Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jagat Bahadur Singh vs Hukum Chand Jute Mills Prathmik ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 14443 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14443 MP
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Jagat Bahadur Singh vs Hukum Chand Jute Mills Prathmik ... on 4 September, 2023
Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
                                                     1
                          IN    THE     HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                             AT JABALPUR
                                                  BEFORE
                               HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
                                         ON THE 4 th OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
                                         WRIT PETITION No. 19828 of 2018

                         BETWEEN:-
                         JAGAT BAHADUR SINGH S/O LATE SRI LAL JI SINGH,
                         AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCCUPATION: ASSISTANT
                         TEACHER, R/O. VILLAGE CHOTA TIKAT (TIKATH
                         KHURD), POST MAWAI, DISTRICT- SIDHI (MADHYA
                         PRADESH).

                                                                             .....PETITIONER
                         (BY SHRI PURUSHOTTAM NARAIN PATHAK - ADVOCATE )

                         AND
                         1.    HUKUM CHAND JUTE MILLS PRATHMIK SALA
                               SAMITI, AMLAI, A REGISTERED EDUCATION
                               SOCIETY, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, H.J.M.
                               PRATHMIK SALA SAMITI, P.O. AMALI PAPER
                               MILLS, DISTT. ANNUPPUR (MADHYA PRADESH).

                         2.    PRESIDENT, H.J.M. PRATHMIK SALA SAMITI,
                               PRESENTLY     SHRI   A.K.PUROHIT,   CHIEF
                               PRODUCTION      MANAGAR,     O.P.M   AND
                               INDUSTRIES,   CAUATIC   DIVISION,  AMLAI,
                               P.O.O.P.M. AMLAI, DIST ANUPPUR (MADHYA
                               PRADESH).

                         3.    GENERAL MANAGER, ORIENT PAPER MILL
                               CAUATIC DIVISION AND PATRON, H.J.M.
                               PRATHMIK SALA SAMITI AMLAI, POST O.P.M.
                               AMLAI,     DISTRICT- ANNUPUR  (MADHYA
                               PRADESH).

                         4.    DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER SHAHDOL,
                               DISTRICT - SHAHDOL (MADHYA PRADESH).

                                                                           .....RESPONDENTS
                         (BY SHRI RAJNEESH GUPTA - ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENTS NO.1
                         TO 3.
                         SHRI K.S. BAGHEL - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4 )
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: RASHMI
TIKARAM CHIKANE
Signing time: 9/8/2023
10:42:50 AM
                                                              2
                               This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
                         following:
                                                              ORDER

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs :

"7.1 The Hon'ble High Court be pleased to quash/set aside impugned superannuation notice dated 15.05.2018 Annexure P/6; and hold that petitioner is entitled to work with full service benefits till he attains the age of 62 years ; 7.2 The Hon'ble High Court be further pleased to hold that the petitioner is entitled to full salary and other service benefits from 07.07.2018; for the period he is not allowed to work till he is 62 years of age with penal interest at 12% thereon; and direct the respondents to pay the same ; 7.3 The Hon'ble High Court be further direct the respondents to pay to the petitioner arrears of Salary with allowance of VIth pay scale from January 2006 and that of VIIth pay scale from January 2016; with interest thereon at 12%. 7.4 To grant the petitioner any other relief as deemed fit in the fact and circumstances of the case including the cost of this litigation."

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was working as Assistant Teacher in a private non-aided but recognised school.

3. The co-ordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 23.01.2002 passed in W.P. No.4039/2001 in the case of Triveni Prasad Patel Vs. Hukum Chand Jute Mill Prathmik Sala Samiti and Others has held that the Assistant teacher working in a private school is entitled to continue upto the age of 62 years and accordingly, it is submitted that this case is duly covered by order passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Triveni Signature Not Verified Signed by: RASHMI TIKARAM CHIKANE Signing time: 9/8/2023 10:42:50 AM

Prasad Patel (supra).

4. Per contra, petition is vehemently opposed by learned counsel for respondents. It is submitted that the Supreme Court in the case of St. Mary's Education Society and another Vs. Rajendra Prasad Bhargava and Others decided on 24.08.2022 in Civil Appeal No.5789/2022 has held that the writ petition against a private school is not maintainable.

5. In reply, it is submitted by Shri Pathak that once a person who was similarly situated was granted liberty by directing the respondents to continue him upto to the age of 62 years, therefore, the order passed in the case of Triveni Prasad Patel (supra) is binding.

6. Heard the learned counsel for parties.

7. So far as the aforesaid contention made by learned counsel for the petitioner is concerned, it is suffice to mention here that the judgments passed by the Supreme Court are retrospective in operation unless and until it is specifically made prospective. It is true that this Court may not be able to reopen the judgments passed in the case of Triveni Prasad Patel (supra) on the basis of the judgment pronounced by the Supreme Court in the case of St. Mary's Education Society (supra) but the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case St. Mary's Education (supra) would apply to all pending cases. In these circumstances, petition is dismissed as not maintainable.

8. However, the petitioner shall be free to take up the issue with the Madhya Pradesh Higher Secondary Board or the State or may avail any other legal remedy available to him in accordance with the law. It is made clear that this Court has not considered merits of the case and the entitlement of the petitioner to continue upto the age of 62 years has not been decided.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: RASHMI TIKARAM CHIKANE Signing time: 9/8/2023 10:42:50 AM

(G.S. AHLUWALIA) JUDGE RC

Signature Not Verified Signed by: RASHMI TIKARAM CHIKANE Signing time: 9/8/2023 10:42:50 AM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter