Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

United India Insurance Company ... vs Smt. Krishna Bai
2023 Latest Caselaw 18799 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 18799 MP
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
United India Insurance Company ... vs Smt. Krishna Bai on 7 November, 2023
Author: Vivek Agarwal
                                                       1
                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                            AT JABALPUR
                                                    BEFORE
                                      HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
                                           ON THE 7 th OF NOVEMBER, 2023
                                      MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 6098 of 2022

                           BETWEEN:-
                           UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THROUGH
                           DIVISIONAL MANAGER AND THROUGH AUTHORIZED
                           REPRESENTATIVE DIVISIONAL OFFICE NO. 4 UIIC
                           DOOR NO. 131/11 FLOOR NO. 1 BHOPAL AND THROUGH
                           R/O DIVISIONAL OFFICE NEAR ASHOKA HOTEL
                           WRIGHT TOWN JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                             .....APPELLANT
                           (BY SHRI DIWAKAR NATH SHUKLA - ADVOCATE)

                           AND
                           1.    ADITYA PURI S/O SHIR DEVENDRA PURI, AGED
                                 ABOUT    16    YEARS, OCCUPATION: MINOR
                                 THROUGH     LEGAL     GUARDIAN    FATHER
                                 DEVENDRA PURI S/O NARMADA PRASAD AGED
                                 ABOUT 42 YEARS PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT
                                 VILLAGE BORE SEMARI KATKULA TEHSIL
                                 REHATI DISRICT SEHORE M.P. CURRENTLY
                                 RESIDING AT PUTILI GHAR BAIRASIYA BUS
                                 STAND DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                           2.    MUKESH KUMAR CHOUHAN S/O SHRI MAKHAN
                                 SINGH OCCUPATION: THROUGH AMAR SINGH
                                 R/O JHUGGI NO.213, GAUTAM NAGAR, ARERA
                                 COLONY DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                           3.    SANTOSH GIRI S/O LATE MANOHAR GIRI R/O
                                 VILLAGE BORI, TEHSIL REHATI, DISTRICT
                                 SEHORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

                           4.    SMT. ASHA BAI W/O SHRI SANTOSH GIRI R/O
                                 VILLAGE BORI, TEHSIL REHATI, DISTRICT
                                 SEHORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

                           5.    SHUBHAM GIRI S/O SANTOSH GIRI R/O VILLAGE
                                 BORI, TEHSIL REHATI, DISTRICT SEHORE
                                 (MADHYA PRADESH)
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PUSHPENDRA
PATEL
Signing time: 07-11-2023
19:17:39
                                                       2
                                                                             .....RESPONDENTS
                           (SHRI KAPIL PATWARDHAN - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1)

                                      MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 6099 of 2022

                           BETWEEN:-
                           UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THROUGH
                           DIVISIONAL MANAGER DIVISIONAL OFFICE NO. 4 UIIC
                           DOOR NO. 131/11 FLOOR NO. 1 BHOPAL THROUGH
                           AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DIVISIONAL OFFICE
                           NEAR ASHOKA HOTEL WRIGHT TOWN JABALPUR
                           DIVISIONAL OFFICE NO. 4, UIIC, DOOR NO. 131/11,
                           FLOOR NO. 1, BHOPAL THROUGH DIVISIONAL OFFICE
                           NEAR ASHOKA HOTEL WRIGHT TOWN JABALPUR
                           (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                               .....APPELLANT
                           (BY SHRI DIWAKAR NATH SHUKLA - ADVOCATE)

                           AND
                           1.    SMT. KRISHNA BAI W/O SHRI LAKHAN PURI,
                                 AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCCUPATION: MOTHER
                                 OF THE DECEASED PERMANENT R/O VILLAGE
                                 BORI SEMARI KATKUNA, TEHSIL REHATI,
                                 DISTRICT SEHORE CURRENTLY RESIDING AT
                                 PUTLI GHAR, BAIRASIYA BUS STAND DISTRICT
                                 BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                           2.    LAKHAN PURI S/O LATE SURAJ PURI, AGED
                                 ABOUT 59 YEARS, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF
                                 VILLAGE BORI SEMARI KATKUNA TEHSIL
                                 REHATI   DISTRICT   SEHORE    CURRENTLY
                                 RESIDING AT PUTLI GHAR BAIRASIYA BUS
                                 STAND DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                           3.    MUKESH KUMAR CHOUHAN S/O SHRI MAKHAN
                                 SINGH OCCUPATION: THROUGH AMAR SINGH
                                 R/O JHUGGI NO. 213 GAUTAM NAGAR ARERA
                                 COLONY DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                           4.    SANTOSH GIRI S/O LATE MANOHAR GIRI R/O
                                 VILLAGE BORI TEHSIL REHATI DISTRICT
                                 SEHORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

                           5.    SMT. ASHA BAI W/O SHRI SANTOSH GIRI R/O
                                 VILLAGE BORI TEHSIL REHATI DISTRICT
                                 SEHORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PUSHPENDRA
PATEL
Signing time: 07-11-2023
19:17:39
                                                         3
                           6.     SHUBHAM GIRI S/O SANTOSH GIRI R/O VILLAGE
                                  BORI TEHSIL REHATI DISTRICT SEHORE
                                  (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                            .....RESPONDENTS
                           (SHRI KAPIL PATWARDHAN - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND
                           2)

                                  This appeal coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
                           following:
                                                                   ORDER

These miscellaneous appeals under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 are filed by the insurance company being aggrieved of the award

dated 06.08.2022 passed by learned 23rd Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhopal in MACC No.198/2018 (Smt. Krishna Bai W/o Lakhanpuri and another Vs. Mukesh Kumar Chauhan and others) and in MACC No.197/2018 (Aditya Puri Vs. Mukesh Kumar Chauhan and others) on the ground that as per the story of the claimants, claimants were travelling in car bearing registration No.MP04-CJ-4079. Witness Prakash (PW-3) has deposed that he was travelling on his tractor when two cars overtook him and one of the car had hit the car which was ahead, from behind, as a result, car which was in front turned turtle. One of the boys died on the spot and others sustained injuries.

2. Shri Diwakar Nath Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant-insurance company placing reliance on this evidence submits that offending vehicle will be

the car which was travelling from behind, which had hit the insured vehicle MP04-CJ-4709 and without impleading it, no relief could have been granted by the learned Tribunal.

3. Shri Shukla further submits that car in question was actually sold out in favour of another person and, therefore, insurance company should have been Signature Not Verified Signed by: PUSHPENDRA PATEL Signing time: 07-11-2023 19:17:39

exonerated as there was no intimation of such transfer but Shri Kapil Patwardhan, learned counsel for the claimants submits that the accident took place within 14 days which is the moratorium period for obtaining transfer and giving intimation to the insurance company and thus, that will also not come in the way of the claimants.

4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, evidence of Aditya Puri, one of the claimants, is vital. He too has admitted that the car in which he was travelling was hit from side by another car, as a result, this car turned turtle. Taking these facts into consideration, it is evident that the date of transfer of car is 20.12.2017, whereas accident took place on 02.01.2018, therefore, in terms of the provisions contained in Section 50(2) which deals with transfer of ownership, the person who has acquired the motor vehicle, is required to make an application for the purpose of transferring the ownership of the vehicle in his name, to the registering authority in whose jurisdiction he has the residence or place of business where the vehicle is normally kept, as the case may be, in such manner, accompanied with such fee, and within such period as may be prescribed by the Central Government.

5. Since the period prescribed under sub-section (1) of Section 50 Clause

(a)(i) is 14 days and 14 days time had not lapsed, no indulgence can be shown on the second ground put forth by the learned counsel for the insurance company.

6. As far as issue of not impleading the owner driver of the vehicle which had hit the car from behind in which claimant and the deceased were travelling is concerned, this High Court had an occasion to deal with similar issue in case of Virendra Singh Rana Vs. Pratap Singh and others in M.A. No.257/2004 decided on 11.05.2017 at Gwalior Bench, wherein this Court in para 7 Signature Not Verified Signed by: PUSHPENDRA PATEL Signing time: 07-11-2023 19:17:39

placing reliance on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of M.S. Grewal and another Vs. Deep Chand Sood and others, 2001 ACJ 1719 and also judgment of this High Court in case of Gayatri Bai and another Vs. Ahmadji and others, 1999 (1) T.A.C. 651 (M.P.) and judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Kaushnuma Begum and others. Vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd., 2001 ACJ 428, held that owner of the vehicle is liable for damages to a person who suffered on account of accident even if there is no negligence on the part of the driver or owner because accident occurred when the vehicle was in use and it was held that rule of strict liability propounded in Raylands Vs. Fletcher is applicable in claims for compensation made in respect of motor accidents.

7. Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Khenyei Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited and others, (2015) 9 SCC 273 has held that in case of a composite negligence, claimants can claim compensation from any of the joint tortfeasors.

8. Thus, in the light of aforesaid judgments of Hon'ble Supreme and this Court, I am of the opinion that there is no illegality in the impugned award granting compensation against the insurer of the offending motor vehicle MP04- CJ-4079 as it is to be held liable to be a joint tortfeasor along with the unknown vehicle which had dashed the car from behind.

9. In view of above, appeals fail and are dismissed.

10. Record of the learned Claims Tribunal be sent back.

(VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE pp Signature Not Verified Signed by: PUSHPENDRA PATEL Signing time: 07-11-2023 19:17:39

Signature Not Verified Signed by: PUSHPENDRA PATEL Signing time: 07-11-2023 19:17:39

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter