Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7042 MP
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
ON THE 1 st OF MAY, 2023
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 240 of 2014
BETWEEN:-
1. LAL SINGH S/O PHOOLSINGH RAJPUT, AGED
ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE
VILLAGE SATGAV P.S. MOHAN & DISTRICT
SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. DEVISINGH S/O LAL SINGH RAJPUT, AGED ABOUT
30 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE VILL-
SATGAV, P.S.-MOHAN & DISTT-SHAJAPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
....APPLICANTS
(BY SHRI ANIRUDDHA SAXENA-ADVOCATE) .
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATION HOUSE
OFFICER THRU. P.S. SHAJAPUR DISTRICT SHAJAPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(bY SHRI TARUN PAGARE-G.A)
This revision coming on for orders this day, the court passed the following:
ORDER
This is revision u/S.397/401 of the Cr.P.C. arising out of judgment of
conviction and sentence dated 22.02.2014 passed by II ASJ, shajapur in Criminal
Appeal No.132/2013 arising out of judgment dated 25.2.2013 passed by JMFC,
Shajapur in criminal case No.1561/2011 whereby the appeal has been allowed in
part and conviction under section 325/34 IPC was maintained however the
sentence was reduced from 2 years to 3 months RI and fine amount is enhanced
from Rs.200/- to Rs.1000/- each with default stipulation. Signature Not Verified Signed by: MUKTA CHANDRASHEKHAR KOUSHAL Signing time: 02-May-23 10:34:25 AM
2. Counsel for applicants submits that the applicants have already undergone
jail sentence of 22 days out of 3 months and the incident had taken place in the
year 2012. The applicants were on bail during trial, appeal and revision and did
not misuse the liberty. They maintained good record and relation with the
complainant. No purpose would be served in sending the applicants in jail after
such long period. Therefore, the applicants may be sentenced to the period already
undergone and fine amount may be increased which may be directed to be paid to
the complainant.
3. Counsel for State does not dispute the aforesaid facts.
4. After hearing learned counsel for parties and taking into consideration the
short jail sentence of the applicants and the period already undergone by them, I
am of the opinion that a case is made out for sentencing the applicants to the
period already undergone with enhancement of fine amount. Further the incident
had taken place in the year 2012 and the applicants have maintained good record
and did not misuse the liberty. No purpose would be served in sending the
applicants in jail after such long period.
5. Therefore, the revision is partly allowed. The conviction is maintained.
The jail sentence of the applicants is reduced to the period already undergone by
them and the fine amount is enhanced from Rs1000/- to Rs.5,000/- each. The
enhanced fine amount shall be paid to the complainant-Kailashbai. The bail bonds
of the applicants shall be discharged after deposit of the fine amount. In case if the
applicants fail to deposit the fine amount within the aforesaid period, the applicants
shall undergo the remaining jail sentence as per the order of appellate court.
C.c as per rules.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: MUKTA CHANDRASHEKHAR KOUSHAL Signing time: 02-May-23 10:34:25 AM
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE
MK
Signature Not Verified Signed by: MUKTA CHANDRASHEKHAR KOUSHAL Signing time: 02-May-23 10:34:25 AM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!