Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Monali Kungani vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 8180 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8180 MP
Judgement Date : 1 June, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Monali Kungani vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 June, 2023
Author: Rajendra Kumar (Verma)
                                                                       1
                                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                             AT JABALPUR
                                                                WP No. 12248 of 2023
                                          (MONALI KUNGANI AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)

                                    Dated : 01-06-2023
                                          Shri Anshul Tiwari - Advocate for petitioners.

                                          Ms. Swati A. George - Panel Laywer for respondent No.1/State.

Issue notice to respondent No.2 by registered mode on payment of process fee within seven working days.

This petition is filed on the ground that preliminary examination

was conducted on 12/01/2020 by the Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission for recruiting persons to various posts under the M.P. State Civil Services.

R es ult of preliminary examination was declared on 21/12/2020. Petitioners had cleared that exam then main exam was conducted between 21/3/2021 and 26/3/2021. Petitioners had cleared that main exam also for which result was declared on 31/12/2021.

It is submitted that in the meanwhile, Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.P. No.542/2021 decided on 7th April, 2022 held that even

reserve category candidates are entitled to seek migration from reserve category to general category on the basis of their merits, therefore, taking this decision in consideration, respondents have revised the merit list and have held petitioners to be not eligible even for main examination.

It is submitted that this exercise conducted behind back of the petitioners has caused prejudice to the petitioner inasmuch as earlier Hon'ble Division Signature Not Verified SAN

Bench of this High Court in W.P. No.8750/2022 after considering the Digitally signed by NITESH PANDEY Date: 2023.06.01 18:36:41 IST

judgment passed by another Division Bench in W.P. No.542/2021 on 7th April,

2022 vide its order dated 02/01/2023 held that preliminary examination is only a screening test and, therefore, migration will not be permissible.

Taking this judgment into consideration which has considered the earlier judgment dated 7th April, 2022, it is submitted that revision of result of the preliminary examination on a subsequent decision from a retrospective effect is uncalled for.

Since petitioners have already qualified the main exam, they cannot be debarred from undertaking the interview and that interview be made subject to outcome of this writ petition.

Though this contention put forth by Anshul Tiwari, is challenged

by Ms. Swati A. George, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1/State, but, prima facie, there appears to be substance in the arguments. Firstly, whether the decision dated 7th April, 2022 can be applied retrospectively is the moot question even if its validity as has been doubted by the subsequent decision in W.P. No.8750/2022 is overlooked for the moment in hypothetical manner. Secondly, the fact is that once petitioners had cleared the prelims and main examination, then can they be debarred on the basis of the subsequent judgment i.e. whether the decision dated 7th April, 2022 will have retrospective application or will be prospective in nature. Third question is that whether those candidates who were permitted to migrate presuming the validity and correctness of the decision dated 7th April, 2022 to be intact, then can the authorities still revise the result retrospectively or they are required to create supernumerary slots for accommodating such migration without

Signature Not Verified adversely affecting the rights of the petitioners or similarly situated SAN

Digitally signed by NITESH PANDEY persons who had cleared the prelims as per those parameters which Date: 2023.06.01 18:36:41 IST

were applicable at the time of declaration of result and thereafter succeeded in

main exam also.

These being the issues which needs to be answered by the respondents, let respondents permit the petitioners to participate in the interview subject to the outcome of this petition and file their additional reply within four weeks.

List this case along with W.P No.4783 of 2023.

(RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)) V. JUDGE

Nitesh

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by NITESH PANDEY Date: 2023.06.01 18:36:41 IST

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter