Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11028 MP
Judgement Date : 17 July, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
ON THE 17 th OF JULY, 2023
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 830 of 2005
BETWEEN:-
1. BABULAL S/O BIHARILAL , AGED ABOUT 62
Y E A R S , O C C U PAT I O N : NOT MENTIONED,
RESIDENT OF GRAM SAMBAL PURA,TEH.
CHHACHODA, DISTRICT GUNA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2. RAMGHAN S/O BABOOLAL , AGED ABOUT 40
Y E A R S , OCCUPATION: NOT MENTIONED,
RESIDENT OF GRAM SANWALPURA, CHADHODA,
DISTRICT GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONERS
(NO ONE APPEARS FOR THE PETITIONERS)
AND
STATE OF M.P. THRU P.S. CHHACHODA, DISTRICT
GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
( SHRI R. K. UPADHYAY- LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT -
STATE)
Th is revision coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
This revision is pending since 2005. On 16-04-2023 and 27-09-2023 no one had appeared for the petitioner. On 13-12-2014, the matter could not be settled before the Lok Adalat. Today also, no body appears for the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners have lost their interest in prosecuting this revision.
Perused the record.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: MAHENDRA BARIK Signing time: 7/18/2023 1:39:13 PM
This criminal revision under Section 397/401 of CrPC has been preferred by petitioners against the judgment dated 08-11-2005 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Chachoda, District Guna in Criminal Appeal No. 02 of 2005 confirming the judgment dated 03-12-2004 passed by the Court of JMFC, Chachoda, District Guna in Criminal Case No. 647 of 1996 whereby the petitioners have been convicted under Section 324, 325 of IPC and sentenced to undergo six-six months RI with fine of Rs.300-300/- and one-one year RI with fine of Rs.400-400/- respectively.
On going through the evidence, in the considered opinion of this Court, no illegality or perversity has been committed by the Courts below in convicting
the petitioner.
The Apex Court in the case of Duli Chand Vs. Delhi Administration as reported in (1975) 4 SCC 649 has held that the jurisdiction of the High Court in a criminal revision is severely restricted and it cannot embark upon a re-appreciation of evidence. The said judgment has been followed by the Apex Court in the case of State of Maharashtra Vs. Jagmohan Singh Kuldip Singh Anand and Others as reported in (2004) 7 SCC 659.
Consequently, this revision stands dismissed.
(DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL) JUDGE MKB
Signature Not Verified Signed by: MAHENDRA BARIK Signing time: 7/18/2023 1:39:13 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!