Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2732 MP
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA
ON THE 14 th OF FEBRUARY, 2023
MISC. PETITION No. 693 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
MADHU DEVI JAT W/O SHRI SHYAM SINGH JAT, AGED
ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOMEMAKER R/O
KURAVAR TEHSIL NARSINGHARH DISTT. RAJGARH
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(SHRI JEETENDRA LODHI, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER )
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH COLLECTOR
DISTT. RAJGARH BIAORA NEW COLLECTORATE
COMPOSITE BUILDING ROOM NO. 101 RAJGARH
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (REVENUE) CUM LAND
ACQUISITION OFFICER / COMPETENT
AUTHOR ITY SUB DIVISION NARSINGHGARH
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER M.P. ROAD
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, GUNA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
4. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
THROUGH PROJECT DIRECTOR REGIONAL
OFFICE, E-2/167, ARERA COLONY NEARY
HABIBGANJ RAILWAY STATION, BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
( SHRI ANAND SONI, LEARNED ADDL.ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR THE
RESPONDENTS)
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: SHAILESH PATIL
Signing time: 2/15/2023
10:11:25 AM
2
This petition coming on for admission this day, JUSTICE SUSHRUT
ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI passed the following:
ORDER
This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed assailing the order dated 5.11.2022 passed in Case No.06/2020-21 by the 1st Addl.District Judge, Narsinghgarh, District Rajgarh, which had refused to exercise jurisdiction over the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on the ground that arbitration proceedings took place at Bhopal before Commissioner, Bhopal under Section 3-G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, therefore, the District Court at Bhopal would have the
jurisdiction.
This fact gets fortified by the judgment of this Court in the case of M.P.Road Development Corporation Vs. Baisakhu @ Sadhu , AIR 2021 MP 125, where it has been held that since the Commissioner, Jabalpur was appointed as Arbitrator to determine the compensation in the arbitration proceedings, therefore, application filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act would be maintainable at Jabalpur and not at Mandla.
In view of the aforesaid pronunciation, learned Court below has not committed any error in refusing to exercise the jurisdiction over the application. Accordingly, this misc.petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the appropriate Forum in accordance with law, if so advised.
(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI) (PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA)
JUDGE JUDGE
patil
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: SHAILESH PATIL
Signing time: 2/15/2023
10:11:25 AM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!