Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Krishna vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 22168 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 22168 MP
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Krishna vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 December, 2023

Author: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar

Bench: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar

                                                               1
                             IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                   AT GWALIOR
                                                      BEFORE
                                    HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR
                                              ON THE 22 nd OF DECEMBER, 2023
                                          MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 50146 of 2023

                            BETWEEN:-
                            KRISHNA S/O SHRI SULTAN SINGH GURJAR, AGED
                            ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST R/O
                            VILLAGE HOLA KA PURA, P.S. SARAY CHHOLA,
                            DISTRICT MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                             .....APPLICANT
                            (SHRI ASHA RAM SHIVHARE - ADVOCATE)

                            AND
                            THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATION HOUSE
                            OFFICER THROUGH POLICE STATION CIVIL LINES
                            DISTRICT MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                           .....RESPONDENT
                            (SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH YADAV - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)

                                  This application coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the
                            following:
                                                                ORDER

I.A. No.23433 of 2023, application moved on behalf of the complainant for taking documents on record is considered and allowed and the documents appended with the application are taken on record.

This first bail application has been filed by applicant under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.823/2017 registered at Police Station- Civil Line, District Morena (M.P.) for offence punishable under Sections 307, 353, 332, 294, 186, 147, 148, 149 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act.

A s per the case of prosecution, ASI Ramveer Singh PS - Civil Line, Morena reported that during mobile patrolling, he received information that unknown persons armed with firearms are blocking the road. He reached near Sikraoda Canal, unknown persons started manhandling him. He sustained injuries on his chest and legs. Meanwhile, police force arrived on his intimation. The unknown persons started firing with firearms. They saved their lives by hiding behind the trucks and other vehicles. In the light near National Highway Bridge, Dharmendra Gurjar, Krishna Gurjar (applicant), Jitendra Gurjar and Badshah were identified as the person in the mob. On such allegations, PS - Civil Line registered FIR at Crime No.823/2017 for offence punishable under

Sections 307, 353, 332, 294, 186, 147, 148, 149 of IPC. ASI Ramveer Singh was forwarded for medico legal examination. Two contusions and one abrasion was found on his chest and leg. Statements of witnesses have been recorded. As the applicant Krishna Gurjar was absconding, Final Report was submitted against other co-accused. Applicant was arrested on 19.10.2023, in compliance with the permanent warrant of arrest. He is in custody ever since.

Learned Counsel for the applicant, in addition to the grounds mentioned in the application, submits that applicant is falsely implicated in this matter. No life threatening injury was caused to any person. Learned counsel referring to judgment dated 04.12.2023 passed in ST No.95/2019 by IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Morena submits that co-accused have been acquitted. ASI Ramveer Singh deposed that he could not identify any assailants. Learned counsel further submits that applicant was not aware of the prosecution, therefore, he could not remain present before the Trial Court. There is no lieklihood of tampering with the evidence by the applicant as most of the

witnesses relate to Police Department. Applicant is aged 29 years. He is an

agriculturist by profession. There is no likelihood of his absconsion leaving behind his family and agricultural field. He is a sole bread earner in the family. No further custodial interrogation is required in the matter. Jail incarceration on false allegation is causing great hardship to the applicant. The trial would take time to complete. Therefore, applicant may be extended the benefit of bail.

Per contra, learned Counsel for the State opposes the bail application citing criminal history of eight cases against the applicant.

In reply, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been released on bail in all matters. Other cases are pending for trial. He has never been convicted.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. Considering the arguments advanced by both the parties and overall circumstances of the case but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court is inclined to release the applicant on bail. Thus, the application is allowed.

Accordingly, it is directed that the applicant Krishna Gurjar shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No.823/2017 registered at Police Station- Civil Line, District Morena (M.P.) for offence punishable under Sections 307, 353, 332, 294, 186, 147, 148, 149 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees

One Lac Only) with two local solvent sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, for compliance with the following conditions, :

1. The applicant shall remain present on every date of hearing as may be directed by the concerned Court;

2. The applicant shall not commit or get involved in any offence of

similar nature;

3. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them/him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the investigating officer;

4. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly attempt to tamper with the evidence or allure, pressurize or threaten the witness;

5. The applicant shall ensure due compliance of provisions of Section 309 of Cr.P.C regarding examination of witness in attendance;

This order shall be effective till the end of trial. However, in case of breach of any of the pre-condition of bail, it shall become ineffective without reference to the Court.

CC as per rules.

(SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR) JUDGE Vijay

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter