Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14541 MP
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
ON THE 10th OF NOVEMBER, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 25589 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
1. MANOHAR SINGH YADAV S/O SHRI
MEHARWAN SINGH, AGED 57 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: SERVICE, OFFICE OF WATER
RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SUB DIVISION
PICHHOR, DIVISION SHIVPURI (M.P.) R/O-
GRAM BUDERA POST GOODAR TEHSIL
KHANIYADHANA DISTRICT SHIPVURI
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. RAGHUVIR CHAPKAR S/O SHRI RAMBHAROSE,
AGED - 44 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SERVICE,
OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT,
SUB DIVISION PICHHOR, DIVISION SHIVPURI
(M.P.) R/O- CHOTE JAIN MANDIR KE PASS
KHANIYADHANA DISTRICT SHIVPURI
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. VEER SINGH YADAV S/O SHRI BRAJBHAN
SINGH, AGED 60 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
SERVICE, OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT, SUB DIVISION PICHHOR,
DIVISION SHIVPURI (M.P.) R/O GRAM BADERA
MAJRA JALAR TAPRA POST BADERA DISTRICT
SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. MUNNALAL SHARMA S/O SHRI NATHULAL
SHARMA, AGED - 57 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
SERVICE, OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT, SUB DIVISION PICHHOR,
DIVISION SHIVPURI (M.P.) R/O- GRAM EVM
POST KHERWASH DISTRICT SHIVPURI
(MADHYA PRADESH)
5. PAWAN KUMAR KHARE S/O SHRI
HARISHANKAR KHARE, AGED 59 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: SERVICE, OFFICE OF WATER
RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SUB DIVISION
PICHHOR, DIVISION SHIVPURI (MADHYA
PRADESH) R/O- RAJGHAT COLONY ,
KHANIYADHANA DIST. SHIVPURI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2
6. KAILASH SHARMA S/O SHRI HARCHARAN
SHARMA, AGED 57 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
SERVICE, OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT, SUB DIVISION PICHHOR,
DIVISION SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH) R/O-
GRAM BUKRA POST GUDAR DISTRICT
SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
7. RAMESH RAJAK S/O SHRI GORELAL, AGED - 52
YEAR S , OCCUPATION: SERVICE, OFFICE OF
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SUB
DIVISION PICHHOR, DIVISION SHIVPURI
(MADHYA PRADESH) R/O GRAM BHUTARI POST
GUDAR DISTRICT SHIVPURI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
8. PREM KUMAR RAJAK S/O SHRI MUNNALAL,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
SERVICE, OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT, SUB DIVISION PICHHOR,
DIVISION SHIVPURI (M.P.) R/O NARIYA
MOHALLA WARD NO. 12, PICCHORE DIST.
SHIPVURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
9. PEETAM RAJAK S/O RATNA RAJAK, AGED - 61
YEAR S , OCCUPATION: SERVICE, OFFICE OF
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SUB
DIVISION PICHHOR, DIVISION SHIVPURI
(MADHYA PRADESH) R/O GRAM CHIRONA
POST DABIYAKALA DIST. SHIVPURI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
10. HISAABI VERMA S/O SHRI VISHWANATH, AGED
59 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SERVICE, OFFICE OF
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SUB
DIVISION PICHHOR, DIVISION SHIVPURI (M.P.)
R/O GRAM BHUTARI POST GOODAR DISTRICT
SHIPVURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
11. DISSA PAL S/O SHRI BHAMMA PAL, AGED - 54
YEAR S , OCCUPATION: SERVICE, OFFICE OF
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SUB
DIVISION PICHHOR, DIVISION SHIVPURI (M.P.)
R/O- GRAM DEVKHO MAJRA TILA, DISTRICT
SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
12. INRAPAL SINGH S/O SHRI PYARERAJA,, AGED
56 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SERVICE, OFFICE OF
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SUB
DIVISION PICHHOR, DIVISION SHIVPURI (M.P.)
R/O GRAM JERA POST DEVKHO DISTRICT
3
SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI K.K. SHRIVASTAVA-ADVOCATE)
AND
1. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA VALLABH
BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, WATER RESOURCE
D EPARTM EN T, NARMADA BHAWAN, TULSI
NAGAR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT, YAMUNA KACHAR, THATHIPUR,
GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. S.E. WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT,
NICHLA CHAMBAL MANDAL MORENA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4 (a). S.E. WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
MANDAL GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER
RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, DIVISION SHIVPURI
DISTRICT SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI SANJAY KUMAR SHARMA-GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR
STATE)
Th is petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-
i) That, the impugned action on the annexure-P-1 of the respondents may kindly be declared as illegal and the same may kindly be quashed;
ii) That, a direction may kindly be given to the respondents to give the benefit of regular/minimum pay scale of the post on which the petitioners are working and classified as permanent employees as w.e.f. 11.03.2006 and pay the difference of arrears on fixation of pay from the date of classification along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. as per the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Ramnaresh Rawat (Supra);
iii) That, the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioners and make the member of GPF;
iv) Cost of this petition may kindly be awarded; and
v) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted to the petitioners
It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that petitioners were employed on daily wages as Labourer in the respondents department. They were classified as permanent employee on the post of Labourer by order dated 11.03.2006. It is further submitted that now they have been declared as Sthaikarmi. However, in the light of judgment passed by Supreme Court in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat Vs. Ashwini Ray reported in 2017 (3) SCC 436, the benefit of minimum of regular pay scale without increment from the date of classification till extension of benefit of Sthaikarmi has not been paid and accordingly, it is submitted that the petitioners are entitled for the minimum of regular pay scale without increment for the aforementioned period.
Per contra, it is submitted by the counsel for the State that the petitioners are entitled for the minimum of the regular pay scale without increment from the
date of their classification only.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners were classified by order dated 11.03.2006. Accordingly, if the classification is intact and if they file representation before the authorities for grant of minimum pay scale from 11.03.2006 till the benefit of Sthaikarmi is given to them, then the said representation shall be decided as early as possible preferably within a period of one month from the date of representation in the light of judgment passed in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat (supra).
With the aforesaid direction, the petition is finally disposed of.
(G.S. AHLUWALIA) JUDGE Aman AMAN TIWARI 2022.11.11 11:23:37 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!