Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prosecutrix vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 6811 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6811 MP
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Prosecutrix vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 May, 2022
Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
                                1
          THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                     M.Cr.C. No.42117/2021
          Prosecutrix Vs. The State of M.P. and another

Gwalior, Dated:06/05/2022

      Shri Arun Sharma, Advocate for applicant.

      Shri C.P. Singh, Panel Lawyer for respondent no.1/State.

Shri Ankur Maheshwari, Advocate for respondent no.2.

This application under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. has been filed

seeking cancellation of bail, granted to respondent no.2 vide order

dated 16/7/2021 passed in M.Cr.C. No.35026/2021, on the ground of

misuse of liberty.

It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the

respondent no.2, namely, Mohit Maheshwari was granted bail by a

co-ordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 16/7/2021 passed in

M.Cr.C. No.35026/2021 and it was also observed that the applicant

shall not commit any other offence during the pendency of trial,

failing which the bail order shall stand cancelled automatically

without reference to the Court. It is submitted that now Crime

No.523/2021 registered at Police Station Gwalior, District Gwalior

has been committed by the respondent no.2 for offence under

Sections 195-A, 294 and 506 of IPC. It is submitted that immediately

after getting released on bail, the respondent no.2 has started

pressurizing the applicant to withdraw her case. He is regularly

sending whatsapp messages extending threat that in case if the case is

not withdrawn, then he would make her life hell. It is submitted by

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No.42117/2021 Prosecutrix Vs. The State of M.P. and another

the counsel for the applicant that the applicant has provided copy of

the screenshots of the messages to the police to show that the

respondent no.2 is pressurizing her.

Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the

counsel for the respondent no.2. It is submitted that there is nothing

on record to show that the screenshots provided by the applicant to

the police were ever sent by the respondent no.2. It is further

submitted that the investigation of Crime No.523/2021 is still

pending and unless and until the police comes to a conclusion that

the messages of threatening were sent by the respondent no.2, his bail

may not be cancelled on the said ground, otherwise it will hamper

and prejudice the investigation. It is further submitted that the

prosecutrix has already been examined and, therefore, now there is

no need of giving any threat and her solitary intention is to somehow

ensure cancellation of bail granted to the respondent no.2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The allegations made by the applicant are that after his release

on bail, the applicant is being threatened by the respondent no.2 by

sending whatsapp messages. The investigation, as to whether these

messages were sent by the respondent no.2 or not, is yet to be

completed. However, at the same time the protection of a witness is

also of a paramount consideration. Accordingly, in the light of the

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No.42117/2021 Prosecutrix Vs. The State of M.P. and another

judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Mahender

Chawla and others Vs. Union of India and others reported in

(2019) 14 SCC 615, the Superintendent of Police, Gwalior is

directed to provide adequate security to the applicant to ensure that

no threat is given to her.

So far as the threatening allegedly extended by the respondent

no.2 is concerned, the Superintendent of Police, Gwalior is directed

to ensure that the investigation of Crime No.523/2021 is completed

within a period of two months. If it is found that the respondent no.2

had sent the threatening messages to the applicant, then the applicant

shall be free to file a fresh application for cancellation of bail.

With aforesaid observations, the application is finally disposed

of.

Let a copy of this order be supplied to the State counsel for

communicating the same to the Superintendent of Police, Gwalior for

necessary information and compliance.

(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge Arun* ARUN KUMAR MISHRA 2022.05.07 15:42:27 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter