Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6710 MP
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
SHRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
&
SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL
ON THE 5th OF MAY, 2022
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 16271 of 2021
Between:-
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR. ITS P.S.
ADEGAON SEONI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI S.K.KASHYAP, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE )
AND
VINOD BHARDWAJ S/O PREMLAL BHARDWAJ ,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
AGRICULTURE `VILLAGE PONDI P.S. ADEGAVON
DISTT. SEONI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
This application coming on for hearing this day, JUSTICE DWARKA
DHISH BANSAL passed the following:
ORDER
Heard on the application seeking leave to appeal under Section 378(III) o f Cr.P.C. against the impugned judgment dated 19.01.2021 passed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012), Seoni in S.C. No.06/2020 acquitting the respondent from the charges under Sections 363, 342, 366, 376(2)(i)(j), 376(2)(l) of IPC and Section 3, 4, 5(k), 5(m), 5(l) r/w sec. 6 of POCSO Act and Section 92(D) of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
Shri S.K. Kashyap, learned Government Advocate submits that as per the prosecution story on 30.03.2019 mother of prosecutrix lodged complaint at police station Adegaon to the effect that on 29.03.2016 at about 12:30 to 01:00 pm her daughter (Prosecutrix) was not at home, she searched her in
Signature SAN Not neighbourhood but could not find her anywhere. She also went to the house of Verified
Digitally signed by respondent-Vinod, who lives in front of her house, his wife and son went to SWETA SAHU Date: 2022.05.07 17:24:53 IST
Chhapara and he was alone in the house, his door was locked, therefore, the complainant came back. After 15 to 20 minutes she saw her daughter/prosecutrix coming out of Vinod's house. Prosecutrix is physically disabled, is not able to speak but understands her mother's sign. On being
asked about any wrongful act done by respondent, she replied yes and upon seeing there was swelling and redness in her genitals.
Learned Government Advocate submits that despite recording findings about the age in Para 21 of its judgment to the effect that the prosecutrix was below the age of 18 years and further the DNA report as well as the Doctor supports the prosecution version, learned court below erred in acquitting the respondent from the charges even in presence of presumption available under Section 29 and 30 of POCSO Act and prays for grant of leave.
We have heard the learned Government Advocate at length and perused the record.
Prima facie, we find substance in the argument of learned counsel for the State.
Considering the aforesaid, we deem it proper to grant leave. We order accordingly.
The matter be converted into Criminal Appeal.
Registry shall issue bailable warrant in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) against the respondent for securing his presence before the Registry on a date to be fixed by the Registry.
Accordingly, this M.Cr.C. is disposed of.
(SUJOY PAUL) (DWARKA DHISH BANSAL)
JUDGE JUDGE
ss
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!