Suresh Shakya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 4940 MP

                              1
           THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                      M.Cr.C.35985/2021
                 Suresh Shakya v. State of M.P.

Gwalior, Dated :02.9.2021

      Shri Puran Kulshreshtha, Counsel for the applicant.

      Shri N.S. Tomar, Counsel for the State.

      Case diary is available.

      This is second application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

for grant of bail. Previous application was dismissed on merits by

order dated 29/01/2021 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 3091/2021.

      The applicant has been arrested on 6.10.2020 in connection

with Crime No. 734/2020 registered by Police Station Jaura Distt.

Morena for offences punishable under Sections 341, 376 of IPC.

      It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the

prosecutrix has been examined and she has not supported the

prosecution case.

      Accordingly, the State Counsel was directed to produce DNA

test report. It is submitted by Shri Tomar that today he has received

the DNA test report of prosecutrix and according to which no male

DNA was detected on the source of the victim.

      Per contra, the application is opposed by the counsel for the

respondent/State.

Considered the submissions made by the Counsel for the

parties.

The Supreme Court by order dated 23-3-2020 passed in the

case of IN RE : CONTAGION OF COVID 19 VIRUS IN

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C.35985/2021 Suresh Shakya v. State of M.P.

PRISONS in SUO MOTU W.P. (C) No. 1/2020 has directed all the

States to constitute a High Powered Committee to consider the

release of prisoners in order to decongest the prisons. The Supreme

Court has observed as under :

"The issue of overcrowding of prisons is a matter of serious concern particularly in the present context of the pandemic of Corona Virus (COVID - 19).

Having regard to the provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, it has become imperative to ensure that the spread of the Corona Virus within the prisons is controlled. We direct that each State/Union Territory shall constitute a High Powered Committee comprising of (i) Chairman of the State Legal Services Committee, (ii) the Principal Secretary (Home/Prison) by whatever designation is known as, (ii) Director General of Prison(s), to determine which class of prisoners can be released on parole or an interim bail for such period as may be thought appropriate. For instance, the State/Union Territory could consider the release of prisoners who have been convicted or are undertrial for offences for which prescribed punishment is up to 7 years or less, with or without fine and the prisoner has been convicted for a lesser number of years than the maximum.

It is made clear that we leave it open for the High Powered Committee to determine the category of prisoners who should be released as aforesaid, depending upon the nature of offence, the number of years to which he or she has been sentenced or the severity of the offence with which he/she is charged with and is facing trial or any other relevant factor, which the Committee may consider appropriate."

Considering the fact that DNA test report does not support the

prosecution case, as well as considering the fact that in view of

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C.35985/2021 Suresh Shakya v. State of M.P.

second wave of Covid19 pandemic, it is also necessary to decongest

the jail, and without commenting on the merits of the case, it is

directed that the applicant be released on bail, on furnishing a

personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lac) with one

surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court or

C.J.M. or Remand Magistrate (Whosoever is available). The

applicant shall also furnish an undertaking that he shall follow all the

instructions which may be issued by the Central Govt./State Govt. or

Local Administration (General or Specific) from time to time for

combating Covid19.

The Supreme Court in the case of IN RE : CONTAGION OF

COVID 19 VIRUS IN PRISONS by order dated 7-4-2020 has

directed as under :

In these circumstances, we consider it appropriate to direct that Union of India shall ensure that all the prisoners having been released by the States/Union Territories are not left stranded and they are provided transportation to reach their homes or given the option to stay in temporary shelter homes for the period of lockdown.

For this purpose, the Union of India may issue appropriate directions under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 or any other law for the time being in force. We further direct that the States/Union Territories shall ensure through Directors General of Police to provide safe transit to the prisoners who have been released so that they may reach their homes. They shall also be given an option for staying in temporary shelter homes during the period of lockdown.

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C.35985/2021 Suresh Shakya v. State of M.P.

Accordingly, it is directed that before releasing the

applicant, the jail authorities shall get the applicant examined by

a competent Doctor and if the Doctor is of the opinion that his

Corona Virus test is necessary, then the same shall be conducted.

If the applicant is not found suspected of Covid19 infection or if

his test report is negative, then the concerned local

administration shall make necessary arrangements for sending

the applicant to his house as per the directions issued by the

Supreme Court in the case of IN RE : CONTAGION OF COVID

19 VIRUS IN PRISONS (Supra), and if he is found positive then

the applicant shall be immediately sent to concerning hospital for

his treatment as per medical norms. The applicant is further

directed to strictly follow all the instructions which may be issued

by the Central Govt./State Govt. or Local Administration for

combating Covid19. If it is found that the applicant has violated

any of the instructions (whether general or specific) issued by the

Central Govt./State Govt. or Local Administration, then this

order shall automatically lose its effect, and the Local

Administration/Police Authorities shall immediately take him in

custody and would send him to the same jail from where he was

released. The applicant is further directed to supply a copy of

this bail order to the police station having jurisdiction over his

place of residence.

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C.35985/2021 Suresh Shakya v. State of M.P.

The other conditions of Section 437, 439 Cr.P.C. shall remain

the same.

This order shall remain in force, till the conclusion of Trial. In

case of bail jump, or violation of any of the condition(s) mentioned

above, this order shall automatically lose its effect.

In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in

the case of Aparna Bhat & Ors. vs. State of M.P. passed on

18/3/2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation

regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.

With aforesaid observations, this application is Allowed.

(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge ar

ABDUR Digitally signed by ABDUR RAHMAN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT OF

RAHMA MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, postalCode=474001, st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=d604b5a66b413c436e6af99

N c6fe547304e1bc26d2b510cc133f1b5 6faa63e77b, cn=ABDUR RAHMAN Date: 2021.09.02 18:33:49 -07'00'