Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6835 MP
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2021
1 WP-22596-2021
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
WP-22596-2021
(RAHUL SUHANE AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)
Jabalpur, Dated : 25-10-2021
Shri Subodh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Ms. G.K. Patel, learned Government Advocate for the
respondents/State.
With the consent of parties, the matter is heard finally. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance on the
order dated 4.11.2019 passed in W.P.No.21196/2019 (Deepak Bajaj Vs. State of M.P.) and urged that this petition may be decided in terms of order passed in Deepak Bajaj (supra). Shri Pandey submits that this matter is identical to that of Deepak Bajaj (supra).
Learned Government Advocate did not dispute the aforesaid fact but urged that she is not aware whether the order passed in Deepak Bajaj and other similar cases were called in question in any writ appeal/SLP etc. Since, it is not in dispute that this matter is identical to Deepak Bajaj (supra), I deem it proper to apply the aforesaid judgment mutatis mutandis
in the present case.
Accordingly, this petition is allowed in terms of order passed in Deepak Bajaj(supra).
(NANDITA DUBEY) JUDGE
b BHARTI GADGE 2021.10.26 12:47:02 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!