Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7898 MP
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2021
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC-57717/2021
Smt. Kamla Bai Vs. State of M.P.
Gwalior, Dated : 26.11.2021
Shri Suraj Bhan Lodhi, Counsel for applicant.
Shri Abhishek Sharma, Counsel for State.
Case diary is available.
This is seventh application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
for grant of bail. The sixth bail application was dismissed by order
dated 23.09.2021 passed in M.Cr.C. No.45100/2021.
The applicant has been arrested on 04.09.2020 in connection
with Crime No.417/2020 registered by Police Station Chanderi Distt.
Ashoknagar for offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 304-B/34
of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
It is submitted by Counsel for the applicant that all the material
witnesses have been examined and they have not supported the
prosecution case. At present, there is no substantive evidence against
the applicant. The trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there
is no possibility of her absconding or tampering with prosecution case.
Per contra, the application is opposed by Counsel for the
respondent/State. However, after going through the depositions of the
witnesses, it is fairly conceded that they have turned hostile and have
not supported the prosecution case. However, after referring to the
cross examination of Amit Singh (PW-1), Gyan Bai (PW-2), Brajendra
Singh (PW-3) & Rahul (PW-4), it is submitted that the said witnesses
had clearly stated that they have compromised with accused. Thus, it
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-57717/2021 Smt. Kamla Bai Vs. State of M.P.
is clear that either the witnesses had lodged false report or they have
not narrated the correct facts before the Court and, therefore, they are
liable to be prosecuted.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
So far as prosecution of witnesses is concerned, the Trial Court
is directed to positively address on this issue in its final judgment.
In view of the fact that material witnesses have not supported
the prosecution case and without commenting on the merits of the
case, the application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant be
released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lac Only) with one surety in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to
appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of the trial but in
case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the
case of Aparna Bhat & Ors. vs. State of M.P. passed on 18/3/2021
in Criminal Appeal No.329/2021, the intimation regarding grant of
bail be sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rule.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge
Arun* ARUN KUMAR MISHRA 2021.11.26 18:33:41 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!