Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramkishore Gurjar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 7716 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7716 MP
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Ramkishore Gurjar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 November, 2021
Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
                              1
         THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                    Cr.A. No.6759/2021
        Ramkishore Gurjar Vs. State of M.P. and another

Gwalior, Dated:23-11-2021

      Shri Sushil Goswami, Counsel for the appellant.

      Shri Rinkesh Goyal, Counsel for the respondent No.1/State.

None for the respondent No.2/complainant.

It is submitted by the counsel for the State that the complainant

has been informed about the pendency of this appeal as required

under Section 15-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act (in short "Act").

Case diary is available.

This appeal has been filed under Section 14-A (2) of the Act

against the order dated 6/7/2020 passed by Special Judge (Atrocities

Act) Gwalior, rejecting the bail application.

The appellant has been arrested on 30/6/2020 in connection

with Crime No.50/2020 registered by Police Station Bijoli, Distt.

Gwalior for offence punishable under Sections 306, 34 of IPC and

Sections 3(2)(v) of the Act.

It is submitted by the counsel for the appellant that the co-

accused Vinod Yadav has been granted bail on the ground of period

of custody. The appellant is also in jail from 30/6/2020 and he was

never released on temporary parole in the wake of covid-19

pandemic. It is submitted that the appellant and the other co-accused

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Cr.A. No.6759/2021 Ramkishore Gurjar Vs. State of M.P. and another

persons were demanding exorbitant interest from the deceased, as a

result, he committed suicide. The trial is likely to take sufficiently

long time and there is no possibility of his absconding or tampering

with prosecution case.

Per contra, the appeal is vehemently opposed by the counsel

for the State.

Considering period of detention, this Court is of the considered

opinion that the appellant can be released on bail and accordingly,

without commenting on the merits of the case, the appeal is allowed.

It is directed that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing a

personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)

with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial

Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the dates given

by the concerned Court.

Before releasing the appellant on bail, the Trial Court shall

verify as to whether the appellant was ever released on temporary

parole or not. If it is found that in the wake of first or second wave of

covid-19 pandemic the appellant was ever released on temporary

parole, then this order shall automatically lose its effect and the Court

below shall not be under obligation to release the appellant on bail.

This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in case

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Cr.A. No.6759/2021 Ramkishore Gurjar Vs. State of M.P. and another

of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in

the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on

18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation

regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge Arun* ARUN KUMAR MISHRA 2021.11.24 17:48:16 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter