Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7403 MP
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2021
1
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.50672/2021
(Gautam Jatav Vs. State of M.P. )
Gwalior, Dated:15.11.2021
Shri Sanjay Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Kuldeep Singh, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.
Shri Ravi Vallabh Tripathi, learned counsel for complainant.
The applicant has filed this first bail application u/S.439
Cr.P.C for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested on
26.05.2021 by Police Station Cheenor, District Gwalior in
connection with Crime No.88/2021 registered for offence under
Sections 302, 307, 323, 294, 506, 34 of IPC.
It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that
applicant is suffering confinement since 26.05.2021 and charge-
sheet has already been filed. He already suffered around six
months of incarceration on false pretext. As per allegation,
applicant's role is attributed to inflict Lathi blow to some of the
members of complainant side in which one lady sustained
fracture over her hand, rest sustained simple injuries. It is a case
of cross FIR wherein at the instance of present applicant side,
cross case vide Crime No.90/2021 has been registered against the
present applicant side. Earlier, complainant party absconded for
months together and thereafter, surrendered, whereas applicant
was arrested much prior to it. Counsel for the applicant relied
upon the judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Apex court in the
cases of Gajanand Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 1954 SC
695, Munir Khan Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 1971 SC
335 and Puran Vs. State of Rjasthan reported in AIR 1976 SC
912 to submit that when both the parties involved in free fight,
then individual act is to be seen. No grievous injuries have been
sustained by the complainant side. Confinement amounts to
pretrial detention. He undertakes to cooperate in trial and would
not be a source of harassment and embarrassment to the
complainant party in any manner. He further undertakes to
perform community service to purge his misdeeds, if any, by way
of plantation and to serve national/environmental/social cause.
On these grounds, prayer for bail has been made.
Learned counsel for the State and counsel for the
complainant opposed the prayer and prayed for dismissal of the
applicant.
Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and
considered the arguments advanced by them.
Considering the submissions and the arguments advanced
by counsel for the parties, but without commenting on the merits
of the case, this Court intends to allow the present application and
it is hereby directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on
his furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac
only) with two solvent sureties each of Rs.50,000/- to the
satisfaction of trial Court.
This order will remain operative subject to compliance of
the following conditions by the applicant:-
1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions
of the bond executed by him;
2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as
the case may be;
3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such
facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the
offence of which he is accused;
5. The applicant shall regular appear in the trial Court and
shall not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and;
6. The applicant will not leave India without previous
permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case
may be.
7. Applicant shall mark his appearance in first week of every
month before the Police Station concerned between 10 am to 2.30
pm till conclusion of trial.
8. ,rn~ }kjk ;g funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd vkosndx.k 10 ikS/ks
dk ¼Qy nsus okys isM+ vFkok [email protected]½ jksi.k djsxk rFkk mls
vius vkl iMksl esa isM+ksa dh lqj{kk ds fy, ckM+ yxkus dh O;oLFkk
djuh gksxh rkfd ikS/ks lqjf{kr jg ldsA vkosnd dk ;g drZO; gS fd
u dsoy ikS/kksa dks yxk;k tk,s] cfYd mUgsa iks"k.k Hkh fn;k tk,A
^^o`{kkjksi.k ds lkFk] o`{kkiks"k.k Hkh vko';d gSA^^ vkosnd
fo'ks"kr% 6&8 QhV ÅWaps ikS/[email protected]+ksa dks 3&4 QhV xM~<k djds
yxk;sxk rkfd os 'kh?kz gh iw.kZ fodflr gks ldsaA vuqikyu lqfuf'pr
djus ds fy,] vkosnd dks fjgk fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls 30 fnuksa ds
Hkhrj lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k o`{[email protected]/kksa ds jksi.k ds lHkh
QksVks çLrqr djuk gksxsaA rRi'pkr~] fopkj.k ds lekiu rd gj rhu
eghus esa vkosnd ds }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izxfr fjiksVZ
çLrqr dh tk,xh A
o`{kksa dh çxfr ij fuxjkuh j[kuk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk drZO; gS
D;ksafd i;kZoj.k {kj.k ds dkj.k ekuo vfLrRo nkao ij gS vkSj U;k;ky;
vuqikyu ds ckjs esa vkosnd }kjk fn[kkbZ xbZ fdlh Hkh ykijokgh dks
utj vankt ugh dj ldrk gSA blfy, vkosnd dks isM+ksa dh çxfr
vkSj vkosnd }kjk vuqikyu ds laca/k esa ,d fjiksVZ çLrqr djus ds fy,
funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa vkonsd }kjk fd;s x;s vuqikyu dh ,d
lfa{kIr fjiskVZ fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rhu ekg esa ¼vxys N%
eghuksa ds fy,½ j[kh tk;sxh ftls fd ^^funsZ'k^^ 'kh"kZd ds varxZr j[kk
tk,xkA
o`{kkjksi.k esa ;k isM+ksa dh ns[kHkky esa vkosndx.k dh vksj ls dh
xbZ dksbZ Hkh pwd vkosnd dks tekur dk ykHk ysus ls oafpr dj ldrh
gSA
vkosndx.k dks viuh ilan ds LFkku ij bu ikS/[email protected] dks
jksius dh Lora=rk gksxh] ;fn og bu jksis x;s isMksa dh Vªh xkMZ ;k ckM+
yxkdj j{kk djuk pkgrk gS] vU;Fkk vkosnd dks o`{kksa ds jksi.k ds fy,
rFkk muds lqj{kk mik;ksa ds fy, vko';d [kpsZ ogu djuk gksxsaA
bl U;k;ky; }kjk ;g funsZ'k ,d ijh{k.k izdj.k ds rkSj ij fn, x, gSa rkfd fgalk vkSj cqjkbZ ds fopkj dk izfrdkj] l`tu ,oa izd`fr ds lkFk ,dkdkj gksus ds ek/;e ls lkeaktL; LFkkfir fd;k tk ldsA orZeku esa ekuo vfLrRo ds vko';d vax ds :i esa n;k] lsok] izse ,oaa d:a.kk dh izd`fr dks fodflr djus dh vko';drk gS D;ksafd ;g ekuo thou dh ewyHkwr izo`fr;ka gSa vkSj ekuo vfLrRo dks cuk, j[kus ds fy, budk iquthZfor gksuk vko';d gSA ^^;g iz;kl dsoy ,d o`{k ds jksi.k dk iz'u u gksdj cfYd ,d
fopkj ds vadqj.k dk gSA^^
It is expected form the appellant that he shall submit photographs by downloading the mobile application (App) prepared at the instance of High Court for monitoring the plantation through satellite/Geo- Tagging.
Application stands allowed and disposed of and file be consigned to the record.
Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance from the office of this Court.
Certified copy as per rules/directions.
(Anand Pathak)
Ashish* Judge
ASHIS
Digitally signed by ASHISH
CHAURASIA
DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF
MADHYA PRADESH BENCH
GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT OF
H
MADHYA PRADESH BENCH
GWALIOR, postalCode=474001,
st=Madhya Pradesh,
2.5.4.20=bf81a9adb1da24e4bc7b
CHAUR
5195154c3d4de08c6bb9303e52e2
e7e728d9bac85bd3,
pseudonym=CA2EA6EDDF504F8F
9C2790FA9A0FD201D0242B64,
serialNumber=A926F3CBF979ECA
ASIA
6A4C477577EEDBA3AB4F94593A
930B98DAE1B0AD16F90B5FD,
cn=ASHISH CHAURASIA
Date: 2021.11.15 18:39:58 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!