Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sawan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 2719 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2719 MP
Judgement Date : 26 June, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Sawan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 June, 2021
Author: Rajendra Kumar Srivastava
                                                                     1                            CRA-3794-2018
                                            The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                                                       CRA-3794-2018
                                                        (SAWAN Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

                                    13
                                    Jabalpur, Dated : 26-06-2021
                                          Heard through Video Conferencing.

                                          Shri Arvind Kumar Pathak, Advocate for the appellant.
                                          Shri R.D. Singh, P.L. for the respondent-State.

Record of the trial Court has been received. Heard on the question of admission.

Appeal is admitted for final hearing.

Heard on I.A. No.707/2021 an application (fourth application) for suspension of execution of sentence awarded to the appellant and grant of bail. Earlier applications have been dismissed as withdrawn as under:-

I.A. No. 7914/2018--------------on 04.12.2018 I.A. No. 14075/2019-------------on 21.08.2019 I.A. No. 532/2020----------------on 07.02.2020 Vide judgment dated 28.04.2018 in S.C.200114/2016 passed by

learned 1st ASJ Khandwa, Distt.-Khandwa, M.P., the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 363 of IPC and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 2 years with a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, Section 366 of IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 2 years with a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and Section 4 of POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 7 years with a fine of Rs. 8,000/- with default stipulation in each.

As per prosecution case, on dated 10.10.2016, prosecutrix PW-1 was missing from her house. She was searched but not found. FIR was lodged. Thereafter, prosecutrix was recovered on dated 12.10.2016. She stated that appellant-accused kidnapped her and committed intercourse with her.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that learned Trial Court Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by PALLAVI SINHA Date: 2021.06.26 17:19:57 IST 2 CRA-3794-2018 has committed grave error to convict and sentence to the appellant- accused. Learned Trial Court did not appreciate the evidence in perspective way. Learned Trial Court held that at the time of incident prosecutrix was below 18 years but mother of prosecutrix PW-2 did not disclose the date of birth of prosecutrix. She stated before the Trial Court

that she disclosed the age of prosecutrix on estimated ground. PW-7 is the father of prosecutrix. He also did not disclose the date of birth of the prosecutrix. Although, PW-4 is Assistant Teacher of the School where prosecutrix studied but he admitted this fact that he did not know what is source of date of birth of prosecutrix. So, it appears from the record that at the time of incident, age of prosecutrix might be above 18 years. Prosecutrix PW-1 admitted this fact that she likes appellant-accused. Both met secretly. Prosecutrix PW-1 is wholly consenting party in this case. Both parties belongs to the Scheduled Tribe in which there is a custom to marry individually without permission of parents. Apart from this, there are material contradiction and omission in the statement of the prosecution witnesses. Appellant-accused is in custody since 13.10.2016 so he has served almost 5 years of his jail sentence out of 7 years. He has served substantial jail sentence. This appeal is of year 2018. It is the time of COVID- 19 due to which final hearing of this appeal will take time. There is every possibility to succeed in this appeal. There is no likelihood of his absconding and tampering with the evidence. Under the circumstances, if the execution of sentence of the appellant is not suspended, his right to file appeal will be futile. Hence, prayer is made for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail to the present appellant-accused.

On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State opposes the submission of appellant's counsel and prays for rejection of application.

Signature Not Verified Heard and perused the record.

SAN

Digitally signed by PALLAVI SINHA Date: 2021.06.26 17:19:57 IST 3 CRA-3794-2018 Having considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and evidence of the case it appears that the age of prosecutrix is disputed, she herself admitted this fact that she liked appellant-accused and both met secretly, appellant-accused is in custody since 13.10.2016, so he has served substantial jail sentence, this appeal is of year 2018, it is the time of pandemic COVID-19 due to which final hearing of this appeal will take time but without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the said I.A. is allowed.

It is ordered that subject to payment of fine amount, if not already deposited, the execution of jail sentence of the appellant-Sawan shall

remain suspended during the pendency of this appeal and he be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the same like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance before the learned trial court on 06.09.2021 and thereafter on all other such subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the trial court in this regard.

In case, the appellant is found absent on any date fixed by the trial court then the said court shall be free to issue and execute warrant of arrest without referring the matter to this Court, provided the Registry of this Court is kept informed.

Further, in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in suo moto W.P.No.1/2020, it would be appropriate to issue the following direction to the jail authority:-

1. The Jail Authority shall ensure the medical examination of the appellant by the jail doctor before his release.

2 . The appellant shall not be released if he is suffering from 'Corona Virus disease'. For this purpose appropriate tests will be carried out.

Signature Not Verified

3 . If it is found that the appellant is suffering from 'Corona Virus SAN

Digitally signed by PALLAVI SINHA Date: 2021.06.26 17:19:57 IST 4 CRA-3794-2018

disease', necessary steps will be taken by the concerned authority by placing him in appropriate quarantine facility.

List this matter for final hearing in due course, as per listing policy. C.C. as per rules.

(RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA) JUDGE

Pallavi

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by PALLAVI SINHA Date: 2021.06.26 17:19:57 IST

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter