Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanjay Kumar Saxena vs State Of M.P.
2021 Latest Caselaw 2576 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2576 MP
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Sanjay Kumar Saxena vs State Of M.P. on 21 June, 2021
Author: Rohit Arya
                                                                       1                                WP-1609-2021
                                         The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                                                    WP-1609-2021
                                            (SANJAY KUMAR SAXENA AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS)

                                3
                                Indore, Dated : 21-06-2021
                                       Shri Manoj Kumar Chourasiya, learned counsel for the petitioner.
                                       Shri P. Ranka, learned Panel lawyer for the respondent-State.

Heard through Video Conferencing.

The controversy involved in this writ petition stands settled by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A. No.37/2018 dated 19/02/2018.

Relevant part whereof is quoted as under:-

"In view of the said fact, though the appellants are not entitled to increment form the date of appointment but we find that the order passed by the learned single Bench to grant annual increment after one year is contrary to the decision of the Full bench in Manoj Kumar Purohit's case (supra). Therefore, the said part of the order is set aside. The respondents are directed to grant the benefit of increment to the appellants from the date of their qualifying the Typing Examination."

In view of the aforesaid, petitioner is held entitled for annual increment from the date of qualifying the Hindi Typing Examination.

Accordingly, petitioner is directed to file a representation in that behalf before the respondent/ authority within fifteen days from today. The respondent in turn shall consider the same in the light of the judgment of the Division Bench as referred above and pass a necessary order.

In the event, petitioner is found entitled for increment, consequent benefit thereof shall be released forthwith.

Let this exercise be completed within three months from today. With the aforesaid, this writ petition stands disposed of.

(ROHIT ARYA) JUDGE

vc

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by VARSHA CHATURVEDI Date: 2021.06.22 11:02:14 IST

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter