Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3298 MP
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2021
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
WP-12075-2021
Nihal Singh Vs. State of MP and others
Through Video Conferencing
Gwalior, Dated : 14-07-2021
Shri B.P. Singh, Counsel for the petitioner.
Shri MPS Raghuvanshi, Additional Advocate General for the
State.
This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has
been filed seeking the following relief:-
"(i) That, a direction may kindly be given to
the respondents to pay the minimum of pay in the
graded pay scale of the post of permanent gangman to the petitioner from the date of his classification as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat.
(ii) Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be given to the petitioner."
It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that he was
employed as daily wages as Gangman in the respondents department.
He was classified as permanent employee on the post of Gangman by
order dated 22.03.2005. It is further submitted that now he has been
declared as Sthaikarmi. However, in the light of judgment passed by
Supreme Court in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat Vs. Ashwini Ray
reported in (2017) 3 SCC 436, the benefit of minimum of regular
pay scale without increment from the date of classification till
extension of benefit of Sthaikarmi has not been paid and accordingly,
it is submitted that the petitioner is entitled for the minimum of
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH WP-12075-2021 Nihal Singh Vs. State of MP and others
regular pay scale without increment for the aforementioned period.
Per contra, it is submitted by the counsel for the State that the
petitioner is entitled for the minimum of the regular pay scale without
increment from the date of his classification only.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner was classified by order dated 22.03.2005.
Accordingly, if the classification is intact and if he files a
representation before the authorities for grant of minimum pay scale
from 22.03.2005 till the benefit of Sthaikarmi is given to him, i.e,
01.09.2016, then the said representation shall be decided as early as
possible preferably within a period of one month from the date of
representation in the light of judgment passed in the case of Ram
Naresh Rawat (supra).
With the aforesaid direction, the petition is finally disposed of.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge
Abhi ABHISHEK CHATURVEDI 2021.07.15 10:33:46 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!