Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4840 MP
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2021
1
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE
Cr. A. No.4121 of 2018
Makhan @ Devendra Vs. State of M.P.
Indore, Dated:- 31/08/2021
Shri Akash Rathi, Counsel for the appellant - Makhan @
Devendra S/o Shivsagar Sutar.
Shri Awdesh Polekar, Counsel for the respondent/State.
Heard on IA No.16517/2021, fourth application under Section
389 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for suspension of
jail sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of the appellant.
The present appellant has been convicted and sentenced by II
Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh, District - Rajgarh (Biaora) (MP)
in Sessions trial No.134/2016 vide judgment dated 10.05.2018, as
under: -
Conviction Sentence
Section Act RI Fine Imprisonment in
amount lieu of fine
363 IPC 5 years Rs.2,000/- 6 months RI
366 IPC 7 years Rs.3,000/- 6 months RI
376(2) IPC 10 years Rs.10,000/ 01 years RI
(n) -
5 and 6 POCSO 10 years Rs.5,000/- 6 months RI
His earlier two applications for suspension of sentence have
already been dismissed as withdrawn, however, his third application
i.e., I.A. No.1478/2019, which was an application for temporary
suspension of sentence on account of demise of his father has been
allowed by this Court vide order dated 21.02.2019.
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE Cr. A. No.4121 of 2018 Makhan @ Devendra Vs. State of M.P.
Counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has
suffered more than five years of incarceration out of the 10 years of
sentence awarded to him. It is further submitted that the prosecutrix
was a consenting party as she has travelled along with the appellant
from 23.02.2016 to various places including Bhopal, Sagar, Chennai
and Ujjain and was recovered on 13.03.2016.
Counsel has further submitted that so far as the age of the
prosecutrix is concerned, although the trial Court has observed that
she was 16 years and 8 months, however, the Scholar Register relied
upon by the prosecution cannot be given credence in the absence of
any date of birth certificate. Counsel has further submitted that the
final disposal of the appeal is likely to take sufficient long time,
therefore, the application be allowed.
Counsel for the respondent/State, on the other hand, has
opposed the prayer.
Having considered rival submissions and on perusal of the
record including the statement of the prosecutrix (PW-5) as also the
other material, this Court finds that case is arguable and since the
final disposal of the appeal is likely to take sufficient long time, this
Court is of the considered opinion that the application for suspension
of custodial sentence deserves to be allowed.
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE Cr. A. No.4121 of 2018 Makhan @ Devendra Vs. State of M.P.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the
case, IA No.16517/2021 is allowed and it is directed that on
furnishing a personal bond by the appellant in the sum of Rs.50,000/-
(Rupees fifty thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like amount
to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, for his / her regular
appearance before concerned trial Court, the execution of the
custodial part of the sentence imposed against the appellant shall
remain suspended, till the final disposal of this appeal.
The appellant, after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his
presence before the concerned trial Court on 13.12.2021 and on all
such subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the concerned Court in this
regard.
Since the appeal is already admitted for final hearing.
List the same for final hearing in due course.
C. c. as per rules.
(SUBODH ABHYANKAR) JUDGE Pankaj Digitally signed by PANKAJ PANDEY Date: 2021.08.31 17:07:31 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!