Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1644 MP
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2021
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.7554/2019
(Ghasotilal @ Ghonsi Vs. State of M.P.)
Jabalpur, Dated:-29/04/2021
Shri Ajay Sen, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Ramanuj Choubey, learned Panel Lawyer for the
respondent/State.
Heard on I.A.No.3470/2021, second application under Section
389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of jail sentence moved on behalf of
the appellant - Ghasotilal @ Ghonsi.
This criminal appeal has been filed against the judgment dated
30/07/2019 passed by Special Judge (NDPS Act) Distt. Panna (M.P.)
in Spl. Case. (SC NDPS) No.2/2017 by which appellant has been
convicted as under:-
Section Imprisonment Fine In default 8 read with 5 years RI Rs.25,000/- 6 months RI 20(B)(ii)(c) of NDPS Act
It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant - Ghasotilal
@ Ghonsi that the appellant has been wrongly convicted by the trial
Court. There are lots of contradictions and omissions in the evidence
of the prosecution witnesses. Appellant has suffered total custody of
around 4 years & 5 months. This is second application on behalf of
the appellant for suspension of his jail sentence. Earlier application
was rejected on 01/10/2019. It is further submitted that fine amount
has already been deposited by the appellant. There is no possibility of
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Cr.A. No.7554/2019 (Ghasotilal @ Ghonsi Vs. State of M.P.)
final hearing of this appeal in near future. Appellant is ready to abide
by any condition which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, prayed
to suspend the remaining jail sentence of the appellant. Appellant
further undertakes to abide by all the terms and conditions of
guidance, circulars and directions issued by Central Government,
State Government as well as Local Administration regarding measures
in respect of COVID-19 Pandemic and maintain hygiene in the
vicinity while keeping physical distancing.
Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed this repeat
application filed for suspension of jail sentence of the appellant and
prayed to reject the same.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material
documents available on record.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without
commenting on merits of the case, the application (I.A. No.
3470/2021) is allowed and it is hereby directed that subject to deposit
of fine amount, if not already deposited, the remaining jail sentence of
the appellant Ghasotilal @ Ghonsi is hereby suspended and he be
released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/-
(Rupees One Lakh only) with one solvent surety of the like amount
to the satisfaction of the concerned Court. The appellant is further
directed to mark his appearance before the Office of this Court on
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Cr.A. No.7554/2019 (Ghasotilal @ Ghonsi Vs. State of M.P.)
21/06/2021 and on subsequent dates given by the Office in this
regard, till final disposal of this appeal.
In view of COVID-19 pandemic, the Jail Authorities are
directed that before releasing the appellant, his Corona Virus test shall
be conducted and if it is found negative, then the concerned local
administration shall make necessary arrangements for sending the said
appellant to his house, and if the test is found positive then the
appellant shall be immediately sent to concerning hospital for his
treatment as per medical norms. If the appellant is fit for release and if
he is in a position to make his personal arrangements, then he shall be
released. After release, the appellant is further directed to strictly
follow all the instructions which may be issued by the Central
Govt./State Govt. or Local Administration for combating the Covid-
19. If it is found that the appellant has violated any of the instructions
(whether general or specific) issued by the Central Govt./State Govt.
or Local Administration, then this order shall automatically lose its
effect, and the Local Administration/Police Authorities shall
immediately take him in custody and would send him to the same jail
from where he was released.
The appellant is further directed to inform the SHO of
concerned police station about his residential address in the said area
and it would be the duty of the State counsel to send E-copy of this
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Cr.A. No.7554/2019 (Ghasotilal @ Ghonsi Vs. State of M.P.)
order to SHO of concerned police station for information.
List the case for final hearing in due course.
E- copy of this order be sent to the Court below concerned for
compliance.
Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.
(Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava) Judge Shubhankar* SHUBHANKAR MISHRA 2021.04.29 14:21:27 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!