Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shylaja vs State Of Kerala Represented By Public ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 2250 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2250 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2026

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Shylaja vs State Of Kerala Represented By Public ... on 25 March, 2026

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
CRL.MC NO. 3308 OF 2022            1                    2026:KER:26337

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

    WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2026 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1948

                       CRL.MC NO. 3308 OF 2022

CRIME NO.1392/2021 OF Palakkad Town South Police Station, Palakkad

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.8 OF 2022 OF CHIEF

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PALAKKAD

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS 1 AND 2:

    1       SHYLAJA
            AGED 59 YEARS
            W/O SACHIDHANANDAN, PRATHIBA NAGAR, KALMANDAPAM,
            PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

    2       PRASAD
            AGED 39 YEARS
            THULASI MANDIR, THORAPALAYAM, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

            BY ADV SRI.V.A.VINOD
RESPONDENTS/ STATE COMPLAINANT AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :

    1       STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

    2       STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

    3       KADEEJA
            AGED 30 YEARS
            W/O KABEER, PANNAMKULAM, PRATHIBHA NAGAR,
            KUNNATHURMEDU, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678013


            SR.PP.SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.03.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 3308 OF 2022            2                 2026:KER:26337

                             C.S.DIAS, J.
                 ---------------------------------------
                   Crl.M.C. No.3308 of 2022
                -----------------------------------------
            Dated this the 25th day of March, 2026

                                 ORDER

The petitioners are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in

C.C.No.8/2022 on the file of the Court of the Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Palakkad, which has originated from Crime

No.1392/2021 registered by the Palakkad Town South Police

Station, alleging the commission of the offences punishable

under Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 , Sections 3

and 17 of the Kerala Money Lenders Act, 1958 and Section 3

and 9(a)(b)(iii) of the Kerala Prohibition of Charging

Exorbitant Interest Act, 2012.

2. The petitioners have filed the criminal miscellaneous

case to quash the final report and all further proceedings in

the above case on the assertion that the allegations in the

final report do not attract the offences alleged against the

petitioners.

CRL.MC NO. 3308 OF 2022 3 2026:KER:26337

3. The crux of the prosecution allegation is that, the

petitioners had advanced money to the 3rd respondent

(defacto complainant) without the requisite statutory licenses

by charging exorbitant interest above the rates fixed by the

Government. They also threatened the 3rd respondent.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that,

even if the allegations in the final report are taken on their

face value, the same would not attract the offences alleged

against the petitioners. There is no evidence to prove that the

petitioners were conducting money lending business and had

demanded exorbitant interest from the 3rd respondent. In fact,

the 3rd respondent had taken a personal loan from the

petitioners, but failed to return the amount. It is only to

prevent the petitioners from the recovering the money from

the 3rd respondent that he has deliberately got the present

crime got registered. Therefore, the entire proceedings may

be quashed.

CRL.MC NO. 3308 OF 2022 4 2026:KER:26337

6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the Crl.M.C. He

submits that there are substantial materials to prove the

petitioners' culpability in the crime. If the allegations in the

final report are taken on their face value, the same would

attract the offences alleged against the petitioners. The

prosecution proposes to examine witnesses and produce

materials which will establish that the petitioners have

committed the offences. This Court may not embark upon a

mini trial and conclude that the petitioners have not

committed the above offences. Hence, the Crl.M.C may be

dismissed.

7. The gist of the prosecution allegation is that, the

petitioners had advanced money to the 3 rd respondent on

interest without the statutory licenses and permissions. Thus,

the petitioners have committed the above offences.

8. On going through the allegations in Annexure 2 final

report and materials on record, I find that there are specific

allegations attributed against the petitioners that they had

lend money to the 3rd respondent , without the statutory CRL.MC NO. 3308 OF 2022 5 2026:KER:26337

license, on interest. It is seen that the prosecution proposes

to examine 29 witnesses and have produced materials.

9. In the celebrated decision in State of Haryana and

others v. Bhajan Lal and others [1992 Supp (1) SCC 335],

the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down exhaustive

principles to quash a criminal proceeding. The salient

principle is that, if the allegations in the complaint do not

attract the offence; then the the power under Section 482 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure can be exercised.

10. After bestowing anxious consideration of the facts and

the materials on record, and the rival submission made across

the Bar, and also, the fact that, though the Crl.M.C was filed

on 26.05.2022 and this Court has not admitted the case and no

interim order has been passed. Hence, I am satisfied this is

not a fit case to exercise the inherent powers of this Court

under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.

In the aforesaid circumstances, I dismiss the Crl.M.C, but

without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to raise all the

contentions before the Trial Court, including filing an CRL.MC NO. 3308 OF 2022 6 2026:KER:26337

application for discharge, provided the charge has not been

framed till date. If such application is filed, the Trial Court is

directed to consider and dispose the application, in

accordance with law.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS,JUDGE

SCB/25.03.26.

CRL.MC NO. 3308 OF 2022 7 2026:KER:26337

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 3308 OF 2022

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure1 CERTIFIED COPY OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO 1392/2021 OF TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD Annexure2 CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN C.C NO 8/2022 PENDING ON THE FILES OF HON'BLE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, PALAKKAD Annexure3 COPY OF THE WITNESS MEMORANDUM IN C.C NO 8/2022 PENDING ON THE FILES OF HON'BLE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, PALAKKAD Annexure4 COPY OF STATEMENT OF WITNESS IN C.C NO 8/2022 PENDING ON THE FILES OF HON'BLE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, PALAKKAD Annexure5 COPY OF THE CRL.M.P NO 1531/2021 PENDING ON THE FILES OF HON'BLE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, PALAKKAD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter