Friday, 05, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shubham Sharma vs State Of Kerala
2026 Latest Caselaw 2241 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2241 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2026

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Shubham Sharma vs State Of Kerala on 25 March, 2026

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
CRL.MC NO. 853 OF 2026

                                   1

                                                        2026:KER:26429

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

    WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2026 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1948

                         CRL.MC NO. 853 OF 2026

          CRIME NO.170/2024 OF Idukki Police Station, Idukki

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.172 OF 2025 OF

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - I, IDUKKI

PETITIONER/S:

    1       SHUBHAM SHARMA,
            AGED 25 YEARS
            , S/O. NATHTHILAL SHARMA, KRISHNA DODABOMASANDRA,
            VIDYARANYAPURA, BABE PERMANENT CHATUS BABA KE MANDIR KE
            SAMANE, BANKNADI ROAD, GOPAL PURA, MORENA, MADHYA
            PRADESH, PIN - 476001

    2       DEEPAK KUMAR,
            AGED 28 YEARS
            , S/O. OM PRAKASH PRASAD, , PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 25/26
            KRISHNA TEMPLE ROAD, DODABOMASANDRA, VIDYARANYAPURA,
            BANGALORE, KARNATAKA, PERMANENT: BADRAJI, NAWADA,
            BIHAR, PIN - 805106

    3       RAJ GOUND,
            AGED 23 YEARS
            , S/O. RAM KISHORE, , PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 25/26
            KRISHNA TEMPLE ROAD, DODABOMASANDRA, VIDYARANYAPURA,
            BANGALORE, KARNATAKA, PERMANENT: BASTI, UTTARAPRADESH,
            PIN - 272001

    4       NEERAJ GURJAR,
            AGED 28 YEARS
            , S/O. BAIJINATH SINGH, , PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 25/26
            KRISHNA TEMPLE ROAD, DODABOMASANDRA, VIDYARANYAPURA,
            BANGALORE, KARNATAKA- 560097, PERMANENT: VIVAKAND
            COLONY, GANESHPURA, MORENA, MADHYA PRADESH, PIN -
            476001
 CRL.MC NO. 853 OF 2026

                                 2

                                                    2026:KER:26429

          BY ADVS.
          SHRI.B.SURJITH
          SMT.RAHANA JOSE
          SMT.AKSHAYA REGHU
          SHRI.ANISH M.M




RESPONDENT/S:

    1     STATE OF KERALA,
          , REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
          KERALA, PIN - 682031

    2     BIJU GEORGE,
          AGED 56 YEARS
          , S/O GEORGE, MATTACKAL (H), CHETTIMMETTEL KAVALA
          BHAGAM, VAZATHOPE, THADIYAMPADU KARA, IDUKKI VILLAGE,
          IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685602


          BY ADV SHRI.LIJO JOSEPH


OTHER PRESENT:

          SR.PP.SMT.SEETHA S


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.03.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 853 OF 2026

                                    3

                                                            2026:KER:26429

                              C.S.DIAS, J.
                ---------------------------------------------
                    Crl.M.C. No. 853 OF 2026
               -----------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 25th day of March, 2026

                                ORDER

The petitioners are the accused 1 to 4 in CC

No.172/2025 on the file of the Court of the Judicial

Magistrate of First Class-I, Idukki, which has originated

from Crime No.170/2024, registered by the Idukki Police

Station, Idukki, alleging the commission of the offences

punishable under Sections 406 and 420 read with Section

34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 66(D) of the

Information Technology Act, 2000.

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent

jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to quash all

further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that

the dispute that led to the filing of the complaint has been

amicably settled between the petitioners and the 2nd CRL.MC NO. 853 OF 2026

2026:KER:26429

respondent, who has executed Annexure-A4 affidavit,

affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the

petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned

Counsel for the 2nd respondent.

4. The learned counsel on either side submit that, with

the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties

have resolved their disputes amicably. The 2nd respondent

has no subsisting grievance and does not wish to pursue

the prosecution, and has no objection to the proceedings

being quashed.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

submits that the Investigating Officer has reported that

the parties have arrived at a genuine and bona fide

settlement. The State has no objection to the Criminal

Miscellaneous case being allowed. CRL.MC NO. 853 OF 2026

2026:KER:26429

6. The scope and ambit of the inherent powers of this

Court to quash criminal proceedings on the ground of

settlement between the parties have been authoritatively

laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court, in Gian Singh v.

State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303], State of Madhya

Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Others [(2019) 5 SCC

688], Naushey Ali v. State of U.P. [(2025) 4 SCC 78],

and in a host of judicial pronouncements. It is held that in

cases where the offences are not grave or heinous, and

where the parties have amicably settled the dispute, to

secure the ends of justice, the High Court may invoke its

inherent powers to quash the proceedings, particularly if

continuation of the prosecution would serve no fruitful

purpose.

7. On an overall consideration of the facts and

circumstances of the present case, and the materials on

record, I am satisfied that the offences alleged are not

heinous or of a serious nature; no public interest or CRL.MC NO. 853 OF 2026

2026:KER:26429

element of societal concern is involved; the chances of

conviction are remote in view of the settlement; and the

continuation of the proceedings would merely burden the

judicial process without advancing the cause of justice.

Furthermore, the settlement would promote harmony

between the parties and restore peace. Hence, this Court

is persuaded to hold that this is a fit case to exercise its

inherent jurisdiction.

In the result, the Crl. M.C. is allowed. Accordingly,

Annexure-A1 FIR, Annexure-A2 Final Report and all

further proceedings inCC No.172/2025 on the file of the

Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-I, Idukki, as

against the petitioners, are hereby quashed.

sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rkc CRL.MC NO. 853 OF 2026

2026:KER:26429

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 853 OF 2026

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO. 170/2024 IN IDUKKI POLICE STATION, IN IDUKKI DISTRICT Annexure A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN C.C.NO.172/2025 ON THE FILES OF HONOURABLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - I, IDUKKI Annexure A3 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER TAKING COGNIZANCE IN C.C.NO.172/2025 ON THE FILES OF HONOURABLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - I, IDUKKI Annexure A4 ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 24.01.2026 Annexure A5 . TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25.02.2026 IN CRL. O.P. NO. 4445/2026 AND CRL MP NO. 3153 OF 2026, CRL MP NO. 3154 OF 2026 ON THE FILES OF HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter