Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Amina Noushad vs Reserve Bank Of India, Represented By ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 942 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 942 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Amina Noushad vs Reserve Bank Of India, Represented By ... on 31 January, 2026

                                                          2026:KER:8179




               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM

    SATURDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 11TH MAGHA, 1947

                        WP(C) NO. 2237 OF 2026

PETITIONER:

          AMINA NOUSHAD
          AGED 31 YEARS
          DARUL AMAN, ERAMATHOOR PO, MANNAR, PIN - 689622


          BY ADVS.
          SMT.SHIFA LATHEEF
          SMT.AKHILASREE BHASKARAN



RESPONDENTS:

    1     RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY AUTHORIZED
          OFFICER,
          NO.6507, BAKERY JCT RD, NANDAVANAM, PALAYAM,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA ., PIN - 695033

    2     THE BRANCH MANAGER
          CANARA BANK, OYUR BRANCH, JS BLDG BUILDING, MAIN ROAD,
          OYUR, KOTTARAKKARA TQ, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691510

    3     OFFICER IN CHARGE, CYBER CRIME BRANCH
          OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT-UNNAO, UP
          INDIA, E-MAIL:[email protected], PIN - 209801

    4     STATION HOUSE OFFICER
          MANNAR POLICE STATION, MANNAR, MANNAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
          ALAPPUZHA, KERALA , INDIA,
          EMAIL : [email protected], PIN - 689626
                                                      2026:KER:8179
WP(C) NO. 2237 OF 2026

                                2



          BY ADV. SRI.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC
                  SMT. K.M.RASHMI, SR. GP.


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                           2026:KER:8179
WP(C) NO. 2237 OF 2026

                                    3




                              JUDGMENT

1. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the debit

freezing/lien of his Bank account with the Respondent/Bank at

the requisition of the Police Authorities. The case of the

Petitioner is that the Petitioner is not an accused in the Crime

registered by the Police authorities against some other

persons, in which the requisition was made; that the Petitioner

is in no way connected with the said Crime; and that the debit

freezing/lien of the account is in violation of Sections 106 &

107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS)

and Article 300A of the Constitution of India.

2. The learned Counsel for the Respondent/Bank, after getting

instructions from the Bank, confirmed that the Bank has

received a Requisition from the Respondent No.3 for an

amount of Rs.15,000/- for debit freezing of the account of the 2026:KER:8179 WP(C) NO. 2237 OF 2026

Petitioner mentioned in the Writ Petition, and hence, the Bank

has effected debit freezing of the account of the Petitioner.

Ext.P4 Communication issued by the Respondent/Bank to the

Petitioner also shows the said Requisition amount.

3. The issue is covered by the decisions of this Court in Dr. Sajeer

v. Reserve Bank of India [2024 (1) KLT 826], Nazeer K.T. v. Manager,

Federal Bank, Makkaraparamba Branch [2024 KHC 768] and Abhiraj

Rajan v. State of Kerala [2025 KHC 1676].

4. This Court has been consistently issuing the directions

contained in the aforesaid decisions with two other directions

for effecting uncommunicated/further requisitions for debit

freeze/lien and making the frozen amount at the disposal of

the jurisdictional Magistrate's Court. This Writ Petition is to be

disposed of, incorporating the same directions.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the following

directions:

2026:KER:8179 WP(C) NO. 2237 OF 2026

i) The Respondent/Bank is directed to confine the order of freeze/lien

against the account of the Petitioner only to the extent of the

amounts mentioned in the orders/requisitions issued to the Bank by

the Police Authorities, and it shall be done forthwith so as to enable

the Petitioner to deal with his account and transact therein beyond

that limit.

ii) The respondents - Police Authorities concerned are hereby directed

to inform the Bank as to whether freezing/lien of the account of the

Petitioner will require to be continued even in the aforesaid manner;

and if so, for what further time, within a period of eight months from

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

iii) On the Bank receiving the aforesaid information/intimation from the

Police Authorities, the Bank will adhere to it and complete necessary

action - either continuing the freeze/lien for such period as

mentioned therein; or withdrawing it, as the case may be.

2026:KER:8179 WP(C) NO. 2237 OF 2026

iv) If, however, no information or intimation is received by the Bank in

terms of direction (ii) above, the Petitioner will be at full liberty to

approach this Court again; for which purpose, all his contentions in

the Writ Petitions are left open and reserved to him, to impel in the

future.

v) The Police Officer concerned shall inform the Bank whether the

seizure of the Bank Account has been reported to the jurisdictional

Magistrate, and if not, the time limit within which the seizure will be

reported. If no intimation as to the compliance or the proposal to

comply with Section 102 Cr.P.C. (Section 106 BNSS) is informed to

the Bank within three months of receipt of a copy of the judgment,

the Bank shall lift the freeze/lien imposed on the Petitioner's

account.

vi) In order to enable the police to comply with the above direction, the

Bank as well as the Petitioner shall forthwith serve a copy of this

judgment to the officer concerned and retain proof of such service.

2026:KER:8179 WP(C) NO. 2237 OF 2026

vii) The directions of this Court in this judgment will not stand in the way

of the Bank effecting freezing/lien based on the requisitions

communicated in the future to the Bank with respect to the same

account of the Petitioner, and in such case, the Petitioner will be at

liberty to challenge the same.

viii) The frozen/lien amount, if any, lying in the account of the Petitioner

in accordance with the aforementioned directions, shall be at the

disposal of the jurisdictional Magistrate.

Sd/-

M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE mus 2026:KER:8179 WP(C) NO. 2237 OF 2026

APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 2237 OF 2026

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FRONT PAGE OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS OF THE PETITIONER IN THE 2ND RESPONDENT BANK, HAVING ACCOUNT NO. 4668101004780 EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE CONCERNED PAGE SHOWING THE ALLEGED TRANSACTION DATED 17/05/2024 EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13/01/2026 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE

EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION FROM THE BANK DATED 15/01/2026 EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL RECORD OF THE PETITIONER EVIDENCING HER MEDICAL CONDITION EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15/01/2026 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BANK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter