Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohammed Shihab N vs Revenue Divisional Officer & Sub ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 829 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 829 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Mohammed Shihab N vs Revenue Divisional Officer & Sub ... on 27 January, 2026

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
                                              2026:KER:6459
WP(C) NO. 16284 OF 2024

                             1




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                          PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

  TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 7TH MAGHA, 1947

                  WP(C) NO. 16284 OF 2024

PETITIONER/S:

          MOHAMMED SHIHAB N,
          AGED 39 YEARS
          S/O ABBAS,NEYYATHUR HOUSE,CHAKKUMPADI,
          VADAKKUMPURAM,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676552


          BY ADVS.
          SHRI. AJMAL V. A.
          SMT.A.C.ARFANA
          SMT.FATHIMA V.A.
          SHRI.BADARUDHEEN NEDUVANCHERY




RESPONDENT/S:

    1     REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER & SUB COLLECTOR,
          REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,TIRUR,MALAPPURAM
          DISTRICT, PIN - 676101

    2     VILLAGE OFFICER,
          KATTIPARUTHI VILLAGE,VALANCHERY,TIRUR
          TALUK,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676552

    3     AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
          KRISHI BHAVAN, VALANCHERY,VALANCHERY
          P.O.,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676552
                                                     2026:KER:6459
WP(C) NO. 16284 OF 2024

                                 2



    4       THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE FOR THE
            VALANCHERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
            CONSTITUTED UNDER THE KERALA CONSERVATION OF
            PADDY LAND AND WETLAND ACT, 2008, REPRESENTED BY
            ITS CONVENER,AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,KRISHI BHAVAN,
            VALANCHERY,VALANCHERY P.O.,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
            PIN - 676552



OTHER PRESENT:

            GP SRI K JANARDHANA SHENOY


     THIS    WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION    ON   27.01.2026,   THE   COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                                    2026:KER:6459
WP(C) NO. 16284 OF 2024

                                        3




                   P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                    --------------------------------
                  W.P.(C.).No.16284 of 2024
             ----------------------------------------------
           Dated this the 27th day of January, 2026


                              JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with following prayers:

i. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to Ext. P3 Order bearing Proceedings No.2890/2023, dated 30.10.2023 of the 1st respondent;

ii. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 1st respondent to remove the property of the petitioner having an area of 8.99 Ares of land comprised in Survey Nos. 127/4-15, 127/4-16 and 127/4-17 of the Kattipparuthi Village, Tirur Taluk in Malappuram District from the Land Data Bank of the Valanchery Grama Panchayat;

iii. Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

2026:KER:6459 WP(C) NO. 16284 OF 2024

iv. The petitioner undertakes that the petitioner will produce the English translation of the documents in the vernacular language as and when directed by this Hon'ble Court.

(SIC)

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by

the 1st respondent rejecting the Form-5 application submitted

by him under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and

Wetland Rules, 2008 ('Rules', for brevity). The main grievance

of the petitioner is that the authorised officer has not

considered the contentions of the petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Government Pleader.

4. This Court perused the impugned order. I am of the

considered opinion that the authorised officer has failed to

comply with the statutory requirements. The impugned order

was passed by the authorised officer solely based on the report

of the Agricultural Officer. There is no indication in the order

that the authorised officer has directly inspected the property

or called for the satellite pictures as mandated under Rule 4(4f)

of the Rules. There is no independent finding regarding the 2026:KER:6459 WP(C) NO. 16284 OF 2024

nature and character of the land as on the relevant date by the

authorised officer. Moreover, the authorised officer has not

considered whether the exclusion of the property would

prejudicially affect the surrounding paddy fields.

5. This Court in Muraleedharan Nair R v. Revenue

Divisional Officer [2023 (4) KHC 524], Sudheesh U v. The

Revenue Divisional Officer, Palakkad [2023 (2) KLT 386],

and Joy K.K. v. The Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub

Collector, Ernakulam [2021 (1) KLT 433], observed that the

competent authority is obliged to assess the nature, lie and

character of the land and its suitability for paddy cultivation as

on 12.08.2008, which are the decisive criteria to determine

whether the property merits exclusion from the data bank. The

impugned order is not in accordance with the principle laid

down by this Court in the above judgments. Therefore, I am of

the considered opinion that the impugned order is to be set

aside.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is allowed in the following

manner:

1. Ext.P3 order is set aside.

2026:KER:6459 WP(C) NO. 16284 OF 2024

2. The 1st respondent/authorised officer is

directed to reconsider Form - 5 application in

accordance with the law. The authorised officer

shall either conduct a personal inspection of

the property or, alternatively, call for the

satellite pictures, in accordance with Rule 4(4f)

of the Rules, at the cost of the petitioner, if not

already called for.

3. If satellite pictures are called for, the

application shall be disposed of within three

months from the date of receipt of such

pictures. On the other hand, if the authorised

officer opts to personally inspect the property,

the application shall be considered and

disposed of within two months from the date of

production of a copy of this judgment by the

petitioner.

4. If the Authorised Officer is either dismissing or

allowing the petition, a speaking order, as

directed by this Court in the judgment dated 2026:KER:6459 WP(C) NO. 16284 OF 2024

05.11.2025 in Vinumon v. District Collector

[2025 (6) KLT 275], shall be passed.

sd/-

                                         P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
                                               JUDGE
JV




Judgment reserved           NA
Date of Judgment        27.01.2026
Judgment dictated       27.01.2026

Draft Judgment placed 28.01.2026 Final Judgment 29.01.2026 uploaded 2026:KER:6459 WP(C) NO. 16284 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 16284 OF 2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 27.07.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE 3 RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 1 ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT NO.A-172/2015/KSREC/006348/23 DATED 05.10.2023 OF THE KERALA STATE REMOTE SENSING & ENVIRONMENT CENTRE (KSREC), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BEARING PROCEEDINGS NO.2890/2023, DATED 30.10.2023 OF THE 1 ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE R1(a) TRUE COPY OF THE KSREC REPORT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter