Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 15 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2026
WP(C) NO. 39235 OF 2022 1
2026:KER:159
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 15TH POUSHA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 39235 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:
1 P.C.KUTTAPPAN,
AGED 72 YEARS
S/O.CHANDRAN,PARAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, KUTTIKKANAM,
PEERMADE, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 531
PROPRIETOR OF BIZNI CABLE TV BROADCASTING CENTRE,
KUTTIKKANAM, HOUSE NO.XVI/486-B.
2 DR.BIZNI.K .,AGED 41 YEARS
D/O.KUTTAPPAN PARAPPARAMBIL HOUSE KUTTIKKANAM,
PEERMADE, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 531
MANAGER OF BIZNI CABLE TV BROADCASTING CENTRE,
KUTTIKKANAM, HOUSE NO.XVI/486-B.
BY ADVS.
SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ
SMT.E.S.SONI
SMT.KUMARI SANGEETHA S.NAIR
SMT.SMT.RESMI A.
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
PAINAV, KUYILIMALA,
IDUKKI DISTRICT- 685 603.
2 THE SECRETARY,
GOVT:OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING
A WING, SHASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110001.
3 CHAIRMAN
TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
NEW DELHI - 110002.
4 THE DIRECTOR,
WP(C) NO. 39235 OF 2022 2
2026:KER:159
BROADCASTING ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD.
NOIDA-110002.
5 THE DIRECTOR,
TELECOM DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
NEW DELHI 110002.
6 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
ELECTRICAL DIVISION, PEERMADE,
IDUKKI-685531.
7 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
POLICE STATION, PEERMADE, IDUKKI - 685 531.
8 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
PAINAVU, IDUKKI - 685 603.
9 THE HEAD POST MASTER,
HEAD POST OFFICE, KATTAPPANA,
IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN: 685 508.
0 ROY JOSEPH,
OWNER OF IDUKKI VISION CABLE NETWORKS@L-VISION,
KATTAPPANA HEAD END CONTROL ROOM KATTAPPANA,
IDUKKI- 685 508.
11 JOJAN.C.KURUVILLA,
CHEERAKALAYIL, KALLAR, PAMPANAR LINK,
LOCAL CABLE TV OPERATOR,
IDUKKI VISION CABLE NETWORKS - 685 531.
12 MICHAEL RAJ,
KARIYARVILLA, ELAPPARA, BONAMI, VAGAMON LINK LOCAL
CABLE TV OPERATOR IDUKKI VISION CABLE NETWORKS -
685 503.
13 NAVIN @ NAVIN G THAMPY,
GURUMANDIRAM, ELAPPARA LINK LOCAL CABLE OPERATOR IDUKKI
VISION CABLE NETWORKS - 685 501.
14 KALAÍSELVAM,
GITA BHAVAN, MANJUMALA, VANDIPERIYAR LINK LOCAL CABLE
TV OPERATOR, IDUKKI VISION CABLE NETWORKS - 685 533.
15 ALEX,
PADIPPARAMPIL, PALLIKKUNNU, LINK LOCAL CABLE TV
WP(C) NO. 39235 OF 2022 3
2026:KER:159
OPERATOR, IDUKKI VISION CABLE NETWORKS - 685 531.
BY ADVS.
SHRI.JAISHANKAR V.NAIR, SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL
SHRI.V.GIRISHKUMAR, SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL
SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER
SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN
SRI.ROY JOSEPH
SMT.ANIES MATHEW
SMT.ANJANA RAM
SHRI.NIRMAL KURIEN EAPEN
R1, R7 & R8 BY SRI. P.S. APPU, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER,
SRI. B. PREMOD, STANDING COUNSEL.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
05.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 39235 OF 2022 4
2026:KER:159
JUDGMENT
The petitioners challenge Ext.P33 order passed by the District Collector
dated 25.05.2022.
2. The petitioners challenge the action of respondents 10 to 15, who
carried on activities against the provisions of the Cable Television Networks
(Regulation) Act, 1995 and the Cable Television Network Rules, 1994, and
without an appropriate registration, which forced the petitioners to make a
complaint before the first respondent, District Collector.
3. Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court in judgment dated
17.09.2021 in W.P.(C.) No. 18308/2021, the District Collector, after hearing the
parties, issued Ext.P33 order, which is impugned in this writ petition.
4. Though respondents 10 to 15 were served, none appear.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioners, relying on Ext.P34 issued
to the tenth respondent on 15.11.2016 on an application made on 08.09.2016
and referring to paragraph 4 of the statement filed on behalf of the first
respondent, contended that a period before the issuance of Ext.P34 has been
mentioned, which is obviously wrong. It is mentioned in paragraph 4 of the
statement that the tenth respondent obtained registration from 15.11.2015,
which is contrary to Ext. P34 permission granted on 15.11.2016.
6. Though the learned Government Pleader submits that once the
registration is obtained under the provisions of the Act mentioned above, the
2026:KER:159 MSOS are free to operate in any part of the country irrespective of the
registration in the notified areas. This is disputed by the learned counsel for
the petitioners, who submits that the other contesting respondents got
permission on various dates in the year 2021, as seen from Exts.P36 to P38, and
none of these aspects were taken note of while passing Ext.P33 order. It is
argued that even if they can operate in any area after obtaining registration,
the question is the date of registration granted to the respondents, 10 to 15,
from which date alone they could have operated. It is the petitioners' specific
case that they were put to loss due to the illegal operation of respondents 10 to
15.
7. Since these aspects have not been noticed in Ext.P33 order, I am
inclined to quash the same and direct the first respondent to re-hear the
complaint preferred by the petitioners with notice to the petitioners and
respondents 10 to 15 and take a decision. It will be open to the parties to
produce such materials to substantiate their contention, which will be adverted
to by the first respondent while taking a decision as directed above. A
speaking order referring to the contentions of the parties shall be passed
within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Ext. P33 order is quashed, and the writ petition is allowed as above.
Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
JUDGE
DCS
WP(C) NO. 39235 OF 2022 6
2026:KER:159
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 39235 OF 2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 9TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 09-10-2014 .
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 11/02/2014.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 05/08/2014 .
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 17/03/2015.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 15/03/2016.
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 13/04/2016 .
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 20/07/2016.
Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 17/03/2017.
Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 13/03/2018 .
Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 29/03/2019 .
Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 20/06/2019 .
Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 26/09/2019.
Exhibit P13 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 30/12/2019 .
Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 29/05/2020 .
Exhibit P15 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 16/09/2020 .
Exhibit P16 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 16/09/2021.
Exhibit P17 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 17/09/2021 .
Exhibit P18 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 08/10/2021 .
Exhibit P19 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 14/12/2021 .
Exhibit P20 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 05/04/2022 .
WP(C) NO. 39235 OF 2022 7
2026:KER:159
Exhibit P21 TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED
12/09/2022 .
Exhibit P22 TRUE COPY OF THE MSO REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE
ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 2014 MARCH.
Exhibit P23 TRUE COPY OF THE BECIL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT RESPONDENT DATED 11-03- 2015.
Exhibit P24 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16.06.2015.
Exhibit P25 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 17.06.2015.
Exhibit P26 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 17.06.2015 Exhibit P27 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 17.06.2015.
Exhibit P28 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 17.06.2015.
Exhibit P29 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 6TH RESPONDENT DATED 16.06.2015.
Exhibit P30 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 7 TH RESPONDENT DATED 16.06.2015.
Exhibit P31 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 8TH RESPONDENT DATED 16.06.2015.
Exhibit P32 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 9TH RESPONDENT DATED 17.06.2015.
Exhibit P33 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEDURE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 25-05-2022.
Exhibit P-34 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER GRANTING REGISTRATION TO I-VISION DIGITAL LLP BY THE MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING DATED 15.11.2016 OBTAINED UNDER RTI ACT Exhibit P-35 TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF REGISTERED MULTI SYSTEM OPERATORS (MSO) DATED 24.10.2019 OBTAINED UNDER RTI ACT Exhibit P-36 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE IN THE NAME OF 11TH RESPONDENT DATED 05.07.2021 OBTAINED UNDER RTI ACT WP(C) NO. 39235 OF 2022 8
2026:KER:159 Exhibit P-37 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE IN THE NAME OF 12TH RESPONDENT DATED 23.12.2021 OBTAINED UNDER RTI ACT Exhibit P-38 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE IN THE NAME OF 13TH RESPONDENT DATED 23.12.2021 OBTAINED UNDER RTI ACT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!